Sunday, January 31, 2010
One week to the Super Bowl
With the Super Bowl one week away, it is time to start to take a closer look at the combatants and the match up. Newsletter subscribers already received a detailed preview and that preview will be posted on the Playoffs Preview page shortly before kickoff for all to see.
While it has not been common to have the #1 seeds from each conference make it to the Super Bowl, it happened this year just as the computer predicted. Now, it is easy to pick the #1 seeds to make it, but the computer had the Saints and Colts far and away the favorites at 59.7% and 32.7% chance of making it thus far.
So, they made it. How do they match up? Below are the performance charts for each team through the end of the regular season. The charts including playoff games is in the full preview to be posted later.
Both teams were the clear #1 and #2 all season until they let up on the accelerator late in the year, although the Saints had a large enough cushion to stay #1 even with the 3 losses. If you believe the real indication of the quality of the teams was what they had done in week 14 or 15, New Orleans should be the pick to win. And even with both teams getting back in the swing of things in the playoffs, New Orleans as stayed #1 with Indianapolis now up to #2 in the current rankings.
So what does that mean the prediction is? The computer is picking the Saints by 1.4 which obviously makes the pick against the spread the Saints plus the points.
Stay tuned for the full preview with more details on the web-site later!
Thursday, January 28, 2010
NBA and College Basketball Rankings through 1/24/2010
The NBA and College basketball ratings and rankings have been updated on the web-site through games played yesterday.
In the NBA, Cleveland remains #1 and the Lakers #2 but there is jostling behind them with Utah, Orlando, and Denver moving up at Atlanta, Boston, and San Antonio's expense. All these teams are close though so a loss or big win here and there can cause movement.
In College, Kansas moves to #1 as Duke's loss drops them to #2. Texas' second loss drops them to #6 and Kentucky still isn't getting credit from the computer for being undefeated moving up only to #10.
In the NBA, Cleveland remains #1 and the Lakers #2 but there is jostling behind them with Utah, Orlando, and Denver moving up at Atlanta, Boston, and San Antonio's expense. All these teams are close though so a loss or big win here and there can cause movement.
In College, Kansas moves to #1 as Duke's loss drops them to #2. Texas' second loss drops them to #6 and Kentucky still isn't getting credit from the computer for being undefeated moving up only to #10.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
And There Were Two - Colts vs Saints
We now know the Superbowl contestants and with form holding, which it rarely does, we have the top 2 teams from the regular season in each conference facing off. And while they weren't #1 and #2 coming in to this weekend (#1 and #5), they were every meaningful week of the season since week 5 and are once again in the week 20 rankings below. As usual, the current rankings can always be found here.
The computer did pick the winners in both championship games, but had the wrong side of the spread in the Indy game with the Jets inability to score in the second half letting that margin grow too large and got a push in the New Orleans game where they simply let the Vikings have try after try to tie the score keeping that one too close. That drops the post reason record to 5-4-1 against the spread but increases the picks on winners to 7-3. See this page for details.
Look for a Superbowl preview soon, and as usual newsletter subscribers will get a detailed preview this week including some "what if" scenarios of what the prediction would be if Indy and NO hadn't shut things down.
The computer did pick the winners in both championship games, but had the wrong side of the spread in the Indy game with the Jets inability to score in the second half letting that margin grow too large and got a push in the New Orleans game where they simply let the Vikings have try after try to tie the score keeping that one too close. That drops the post reason record to 5-4-1 against the spread but increases the picks on winners to 7-3. See this page for details.
Look for a Superbowl preview soon, and as usual newsletter subscribers will get a detailed preview this week including some "what if" scenarios of what the prediction would be if Indy and NO hadn't shut things down.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | New Orleans | 87.906 | 15-3 | 80.664 | +0, -0.154 |
2 | Indianapolis | 86.548 | 16-2 | 80.619 | +3, +0.663 |
3 | Minnesota | 85.969 | 13-5 | 79.763 | +0, +0.062 |
4 | Dallas | 85.840 | 12-6 | 81.133 | +0, -0.056 |
5 | New England | 85.586 | 10-7 | 82.233 | +1, -0.048 |
6 | NY Jets | 85.462 | 11-8 | 82.582 | -4, -0.585 |
7 | San Diego | 84.931 | 13-4 | 79.766 | +0, -0.065 |
8 | Baltimore | 84.815 | 10-8 | 81.295 | +0, +0.063 |
9 | Green Bay | 84.750 | 11-6 | 79.329 | +0, +0.019 |
10 | Philadelphia | 84.119 | 11-6 | 81.362 | +0, -0.047 |
11 | Carolina | 83.923 | 8-8 | 82.880 | +0, -0.095 |
12 | Atlanta | 83.820 | 9-7 | 82.390 | +0, -0.103 |
13 | Houston | 82.787 | 9-7 | 80.331 | +0, +0.058 |
14 | Pittsburgh | 82.139 | 9-7 | 79.998 | +0, -0.014 |
15 | Arizona | 81.847 | 11-7 | 79.724 | +0, +0.052 |
16 | San Francisco | 81.324 | 8-8 | 79.202 | +1, +0.060 |
17 | Cincinnati | 81.275 | 10-7 | 80.638 | -1, -0.093 |
18 | Miami | 80.929 | 7-9 | 83.163 | +0, -0.059 |
19 | Tennessee | 80.637 | 8-8 | 81.302 | +0, +0.066 |
20 | Buffalo | 80.400 | 6-10 | 82.456 | +0, -0.049 |
21 | NY Giants | 80.209 | 8-8 | 81.886 | +0, -0.052 |
22 | Denver | 80.109 | 8-8 | 80.860 | +0, -0.009 |
23 | Chicago | 78.455 | 7-9 | 80.051 | +0, +0.010 |
24 | Tampa Bay | 77.621 | 3-13 | 83.317 | +0, -0.104 |
25 | Jacksonville | 77.402 | 7-9 | 80.746 | +0, +0.039 |
26 | Washington | 77.022 | 4-12 | 80.536 | +0, -0.056 |
27 | Cleveland | 76.182 | 5-11 | 80.507 | +0, -0.013 |
28 | Kansas City | 75.521 | 4-12 | 80.538 | +0, -0.038 |
29 | Oakland | 74.563 | 5-11 | 81.311 | +0, -0.060 |
30 | Seattle | 74.459 | 5-11 | 79.780 | +0, +0.058 |
31 | St Louis | 70.285 | 1-15 | 80.393 | +0, +0.072 |
32 | Detroit | 69.560 | 2-14 | 80.975 | +0, +0.015 |
Monday, January 18, 2010
NBA and College Basketball Rankings through 1/17/2010
The NBA and College basketball ratings and rankings have been updated on the web-site through games played yesterday.
In the NBA, Cleveland remains #1 by a healthy margin over a new #2 in the Lakers. The Lakers move up not so much because they had a great week but because Boston went 1-2 and fell. The next 5 in San Antonio, Atlanta, Utah, Orlando, and Denver are very close behind, the 7 spots behind Cleveland all being covered by less than 1 rating point.
In College, Duke remains #1 by over 2 ratings points with Kansas and Texas very close behind. Why isn't Texas, or even Kentucky rated higher given they are undefeated? It is helpful to look at the performance charts for this, so here is Duke, Texas, and Kentucky for comparison.
While Duke has losses, they also have more highs than Texas or Kentucky. Duke has 5 games scoring over 100 ratings points (Charlotte, Gonzaga, Clemson, Iowa St, and Wake Forest) while Texas has only 2 (Pitt and USC) and Kentucky just 1 (Florida). And even in their 2 losses Duke scored 91 and 88 ratings points, while Texas has 4 wins that scored under 90 ratings points (Rice, Gardner-Webb, TAMU-Corpus Christi, and Texas A&M) and Kentucky has 8 such games.
In the end, the computer thinks Duke is better than Texas and Kentucky even though they have 2 losses and the others are undefeated.
In the NBA, Cleveland remains #1 by a healthy margin over a new #2 in the Lakers. The Lakers move up not so much because they had a great week but because Boston went 1-2 and fell. The next 5 in San Antonio, Atlanta, Utah, Orlando, and Denver are very close behind, the 7 spots behind Cleveland all being covered by less than 1 rating point.
In College, Duke remains #1 by over 2 ratings points with Kansas and Texas very close behind. Why isn't Texas, or even Kentucky rated higher given they are undefeated? It is helpful to look at the performance charts for this, so here is Duke, Texas, and Kentucky for comparison.
While Duke has losses, they also have more highs than Texas or Kentucky. Duke has 5 games scoring over 100 ratings points (Charlotte, Gonzaga, Clemson, Iowa St, and Wake Forest) while Texas has only 2 (Pitt and USC) and Kentucky just 1 (Florida). And even in their 2 losses Duke scored 91 and 88 ratings points, while Texas has 4 wins that scored under 90 ratings points (Rice, Gardner-Webb, TAMU-Corpus Christi, and Texas A&M) and Kentucky has 8 such games.
In the end, the computer thinks Duke is better than Texas and Kentucky even though they have 2 losses and the others are undefeated.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
NFL Divisional Round Rankings and Summary
Three of the games weren't terribly compelling, but the last one was, and in any case we are down to the final 4 teams with 3 expected to be there and one big surprise.
But should we really be surprised? The computer had the Jets in the top-10 since week 14 and had them #6 coming in to this game less than 0.4 ratings points behind the Chargers. This made them a clear pick plus the points and they pulled off the minor upset.
The result is that they move to #2 behind the Saints who continue to hold a pretty clear margin at #1. Very close behind the Jets are the other combatants in next weeks games plus Dallas is still at #4 on the strength of their December finish and big wins over Philly. Even though the Colts are #5, we know this is due to not playing starters the last 2 games and thus probably isn't representative of where they should really be rated. Even so #2 thru #5 are less than 0.17 ratings points apart so not much between them.
The computer has done fairly well picking games in the playoffs going 5-3 against the spread and 5-3 picking winners. See the 2010 NFL Playoffs Previews for more details on the picks and performance.
But should we really be surprised? The computer had the Jets in the top-10 since week 14 and had them #6 coming in to this game less than 0.4 ratings points behind the Chargers. This made them a clear pick plus the points and they pulled off the minor upset.
The result is that they move to #2 behind the Saints who continue to hold a pretty clear margin at #1. Very close behind the Jets are the other combatants in next weeks games plus Dallas is still at #4 on the strength of their December finish and big wins over Philly. Even though the Colts are #5, we know this is due to not playing starters the last 2 games and thus probably isn't representative of where they should really be rated. Even so #2 thru #5 are less than 0.17 ratings points apart so not much between them.
The computer has done fairly well picking games in the playoffs going 5-3 against the spread and 5-3 picking winners. See the 2010 NFL Playoffs Previews for more details on the picks and performance.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | New Orleans | 88.060 | 14-3 | 80.612 | +0, +0.599 |
2 | NY Jets | 86.047 | 11-7 | 82.209 | +4, +0.611 |
3 | Minnesota | 85.907 | 13-4 | 79.103 | +6, +1.173 |
4 | Dallas | 85.896 | 12-6 | 81.180 | -2, -1.355 |
5 | Indianapolis | 85.885 | 15-2 | 80.514 | +2, +0.932 |
6 | New England | 85.634 | 10-7 | 82.286 | -1, +0.141 |
7 | San Diego | 84.996 | 13-4 | 79.828 | -4, -0.793 |
8 | Baltimore | 84.752 | 10-8 | 81.244 | -4, -0.783 |
9 | Green Bay | 84.731 | 11-6 | 79.315 | -1, -0.091 |
10 | Philadelphia | 84.166 | 11-6 | 81.417 | +0, -0.403 |
11 | Carolina | 84.018 | 8-8 | 82.977 | +0, +0.136 |
12 | Atlanta | 83.923 | 9-7 | 82.490 | +0, +0.048 |
13 | Houston | 82.729 | 9-7 | 80.276 | +0, +0.208 |
14 | Pittsburgh | 82.153 | 9-7 | 80.007 | +0, -0.122 |
15 | Arizona | 81.795 | 11-7 | 79.667 | +0, -0.382 |
16 | Cincinnati | 81.368 | 10-7 | 80.703 | +0, -0.001 |
17 | San Francisco | 81.264 | 8-8 | 79.130 | +0, +0.066 |
18 | Miami | 80.988 | 7-9 | 83.230 | +0, +0.210 |
19 | Tennessee | 80.571 | 8-8 | 81.243 | +1, +0.138 |
20 | Buffalo | 80.449 | 6-10 | 82.523 | +2, +0.234 |
21 | NY Giants | 80.261 | 8-8 | 81.938 | -2, -0.217 |
22 | Denver | 80.118 | 8-8 | 80.859 | -1, -0.300 |
23 | Chicago | 78.445 | 7-9 | 80.037 | +0, +0.058 |
24 | Tampa Bay | 77.725 | 3-13 | 83.416 | +0, +0.075 |
25 | Jacksonville | 77.363 | 7-9 | 80.682 | +1, +0.167 |
26 | Washington | 77.078 | 4-12 | 80.589 | -1, -0.292 |
27 | Cleveland | 76.195 | 5-11 | 80.517 | +0, -0.120 |
28 | Kansas City | 75.559 | 4-12 | 80.572 | +0, -0.301 |
29 | Oakland | 74.623 | 5-11 | 81.375 | +0, -0.280 |
30 | Seattle | 74.401 | 5-11 | 79.709 | +0, +0.058 |
31 | St Louis | 70.213 | 1-15 | 80.327 | +0, +0.122 |
32 | Detroit | 69.545 | 2-14 | 80.965 | +0, +0.021 |
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Updated Superbowl Odds (1/10)
With 2 teams eliminated and 2 teams through, it is time to take a look at how the Superbowl odds have changed.
The Saints remain the team most likely to get to the Superbowl in large part due to the Eagles no longer being a possible opponent. While they couldn't beat Dallas this year, Philly was rated fairly highly, certainly higher than Arizona.
Naturally the Jets and Cowboys improved as they are past the first game, and in fact they move ahead of Minnesota for winning, but not getting to, the Superbowl. The computer is presently calling the Dallas at Minnesota game pretty much a pick'em right now as Dallas is rated higher.
The Saints remain the team most likely to get to the Superbowl in large part due to the Eagles no longer being a possible opponent. While they couldn't beat Dallas this year, Philly was rated fairly highly, certainly higher than Arizona.
Naturally the Jets and Cowboys improved as they are past the first game, and in fact they move ahead of Minnesota for winning, but not getting to, the Superbowl. The computer is presently calling the Dallas at Minnesota game pretty much a pick'em right now as Dallas is rated higher.
Team | Conference | Superbowl |
---|---|---|
New Orleans | 0.597 | 0.336 |
Indianapolis | 0.327 | 0.178 |
San Diego | 0.280 | 0.160 |
Dallas | 0.237 | 0.133 |
NY Jets | 0.189 | 0.108 |
Minnesota | 0.209 | 0.099 |
New England | 0.157 | 0.096 |
Green Bay | 0.108 | 0.053 |
Baltimore | 0.048 | 0.024 |
Arizona | 0.057 | 0.022 |
Cincinnati | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Philadelphia | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Good Start to the Playoffs
The computer is off to a good start predicting playoff games going 2-0 picking winners and against the spread yesterday. See the detailed picks/preview for the Jets/Bengals and Eagles/Cowboys for more info. Also see the summary for the full playoffs here.
Today, the computer likes New England to cover and Green Bay to win, although the pick against the spread depends on what line you get. The detailed preview for the Packers/Cardinals will go up shortly before game time.
Enjoy the games!
Today, the computer likes New England to cover and Green Bay to win, although the pick against the spread depends on what line you get. The detailed preview for the Packers/Cardinals will go up shortly before game time.
Enjoy the games!
Thursday, January 7, 2010
2009/2010 Week 19 and Final College Football Ratings and Rankings
Ratings through week 19 (games played thru 7-Jan-2010). These are also at http://sites.google.com/site/computerratings/ncaa-football/ncaa-ratings.
And Alabama comes through winning the championship game and affirming the clear #1 ranking the computer had given them throughout much of the year. They were #1 every week but one since week 4 of the season and had a 5 ratings point lead over #2 at the end of the pre-bowl season and maintained that through the bowls.
Behind Alabama, the rest of the top-5 stay the same as coming into this week which may be surprising, but isn't when you look at the details. Florida deserves the #2 spot having lost only to Alabama and dominated a previously undefeated Cincinnati in the Sugar Bowl. TCU lost, and dropped nearly 2.5 ratings points, but Texas behind them also dropped over 1 ratings point to stay behind them, and while Boise State beat TCU and gained 2.6 ratings points, the gap was too big for them to make it all up. What the computer is saying is if TCU played any of the team behind them on a neutral field, TCU would be favored to win.
And the computer had a fantastic bowl season predicting games, so its ratings and rankings must not be so bad. It went 22-11-1 against the spread, a 67% clip which I'm very pleased with. Results for the full season are here but that great bowl season just extended a good regular season bringing the total to 417-316-12.
Now it will be time to turn the computer's attention to basketball, so stay tuned for more on that.
And Alabama comes through winning the championship game and affirming the clear #1 ranking the computer had given them throughout much of the year. They were #1 every week but one since week 4 of the season and had a 5 ratings point lead over #2 at the end of the pre-bowl season and maintained that through the bowls.
Behind Alabama, the rest of the top-5 stay the same as coming into this week which may be surprising, but isn't when you look at the details. Florida deserves the #2 spot having lost only to Alabama and dominated a previously undefeated Cincinnati in the Sugar Bowl. TCU lost, and dropped nearly 2.5 ratings points, but Texas behind them also dropped over 1 ratings point to stay behind them, and while Boise State beat TCU and gained 2.6 ratings points, the gap was too big for them to make it all up. What the computer is saying is if TCU played any of the team behind them on a neutral field, TCU would be favored to win.
And the computer had a fantastic bowl season predicting games, so its ratings and rankings must not be so bad. It went 22-11-1 against the spread, a 67% clip which I'm very pleased with. Results for the full season are here but that great bowl season just extended a good regular season bringing the total to 417-316-12.
Now it will be time to turn the computer's attention to basketball, so stay tuned for more on that.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | Alabama | 93.247 | 14-0 | 72.882 | +0, +1.184 |
2 | Florida | 88.519 | 13-1 | 71.748 | +0, +0.172 |
3 | TCU | 85.160 | 12-1 | 67.725 | +0, -2.471 |
4 | Texas | 84.861 | 13-1 | 70.714 | +0, -1.045 |
5 | Virginia Tech | 83.722 | 10-3 | 73.107 | +0, -0.238 |
6 | Boise St | 83.207 | 14-0 | 63.526 | +1, +2.600 |
7 | Arkansas | 80.847 | 8-5 | 72.646 | -1, +0.094 |
8 | Ohio State | 80.804 | 11-2 | 68.235 | +2, +0.496 |
9 | LSU | 80.531 | 9-4 | 73.061 | +0, +0.178 |
10 | Oregon | 80.294 | 10-3 | 72.403 | +3, +0.347 |
11 | Cincinnati | 80.094 | 12-1 | 68.474 | +1, +0.041 |
12 | Oklahoma | 79.944 | 8-5 | 70.661 | -1, -0.209 |
13 | Nebraska | 79.176 | 10-4 | 69.048 | +1, -0.137 |
14 | Georgia Tech | 78.947 | 11-3 | 73.091 | -6, -1.455 |
15 | Penn State | 78.684 | 11-2 | 66.420 | +4, +0.503 |
16 | Mississippi | 78.455 | 9-4 | 70.151 | +2, +0.077 |
17 | Texas Tech | 78.405 | 9-4 | 67.664 | -1, -0.148 |
18 | Clemson | 78.241 | 9-5 | 70.796 | -3, -0.563 |
19 | Miami FL | 78.219 | 9-4 | 72.025 | -2, -0.319 |
20 | Iowa | 78.032 | 11-2 | 69.404 | +8, +2.013 |
21 | Pittsburgh | 77.808 | 10-3 | 69.043 | +0, -0.050 |
22 | Brigham Young | 77.546 | 11-2 | 67.851 | -2, -0.392 |
23 | Stanford | 76.909 | 8-5 | 70.226 | -1, +0.087 |
24 | Auburn | 76.644 | 8-5 | 72.407 | -1, +0.127 |
25 | Tennessee | 76.297 | 7-6 | 71.768 | +0, -0.016 |
26 | Southern Cal | 76.122 | 9-4 | 70.845 | +3, +0.144 |
27 | Utah | 76.119 | 10-3 | 66.985 | -3, -0.307 |
28 | Connecticut | 76.000 | 8-5 | 69.291 | -2, -0.035 |
29 | Georgia | 75.719 | 8-5 | 73.011 | +1, -0.138 |
30 | North Carolina | 75.707 | 8-5 | 70.071 | -3, -0.317 |
31 | Oregon St | 75.574 | 8-5 | 69.945 | +0, +0.060 |
32 | Arizona | 74.827 | 8-5 | 71.635 | +2, +0.236 |
33 | Wisconsin | 74.447 | 10-3 | 67.553 | +4, +0.474 |
34 | Air Force | 74.358 | 8-5 | 65.617 | -2, -0.262 |
35 | Florida St | 74.277 | 7-6 | 73.475 | -2, -0.329 |
36 | Mississippi St | 74.031 | 5-7 | 73.274 | +0, -0.057 |
37 | Oklahoma St | 73.987 | 9-4 | 68.852 | -2, -0.155 |
38 | West Virginia | 73.893 | 9-4 | 69.886 | +0, -0.059 |
39 | Kentucky | 73.700 | 7-6 | 70.102 | +0, -0.026 |
40 | South Carolina | 73.666 | 7-6 | 73.878 | +0, -0.052 |
41 | Rutgers | 72.994 | 9-4 | 62.510 | +0, -0.052 |
42 | Navy | 72.358 | 10-4 | 65.951 | +0, +0.038 |
43 | California | 72.216 | 8-5 | 70.534 | +1, +0.102 |
44 | Boston College | 71.964 | 8-5 | 69.295 | -1, -0.171 |
45 | Notre Dame | 71.919 | 6-6 | 69.853 | +3, +0.135 |
46 | Central Michigan | 71.909 | 12-2 | 61.036 | +1, +0.089 |
47 | South Florida | 71.867 | 8-5 | 66.893 | -2, -0.060 |
48 | Wake Forest | 71.568 | 5-7 | 71.021 | -2, -0.285 |
49 | East Carolina | 71.034 | 9-5 | 67.694 | +0, -0.079 |
50 | Washington | 70.970 | 5-7 | 71.449 | +0, +0.155 |
51 | Houston | 70.638 | 10-4 | 64.332 | +0, -0.101 |
52 | Texas A&M | 70.496 | 6-7 | 69.760 | +0, -0.127 |
53 | UCLA | 70.488 | 7-6 | 70.790 | +0, +0.103 |
54 | Michigan St | 70.464 | 6-7 | 68.892 | +1, +0.416 |
55 | Missouri | 70.323 | 8-5 | 68.511 | -1, -0.058 |
56 | Minnesota | 68.794 | 6-7 | 70.605 | +1, +0.388 |
57 | Troy | 68.567 | 9-4 | 63.203 | -1, +0.049 |
58 | Northwestern | 68.458 | 8-5 | 64.899 | +3, +0.528 |
59 | Nevada | 68.265 | 8-5 | 64.583 | +1, +0.260 |
60 | Kansas | 68.133 | 5-7 | 69.145 | -2, -0.159 |
61 | Arizona St | 67.958 | 4-8 | 68.416 | +1, +0.121 |
62 | Purdue | 67.797 | 5-7 | 68.440 | +2, +0.359 |
63 | Middle Tennessee St | 67.733 | 10-3 | 60.467 | +0, -0.084 |
64 | Virginia | 67.658 | 3-9 | 73.181 | -5, -0.382 |
65 | Fresno St | 67.452 | 8-5 | 65.474 | +1, +0.362 |
66 | Iowa St | 67.277 | 7-6 | 66.550 | -1, +0.094 |
67 | Kansas St | 66.786 | 6-6 | 67.097 | +0, -0.067 |
68 | Central Florida | 66.638 | 8-5 | 65.081 | +0, -0.117 |
69 | SMU | 66.562 | 8-5 | 64.428 | +1, -0.056 |
70 | Southern Miss | 66.445 | 7-6 | 62.616 | +1, -0.092 |
71 | Temple | 66.386 | 9-4 | 61.461 | +2, +0.101 |
72 | Duke | 66.295 | 5-7 | 67.978 | -3, -0.341 |
73 | Louisiana Tech | 66.239 | 4-8 | 65.693 | +2, +0.405 |
74 | North Carolina St | 66.228 | 5-7 | 67.399 | -2, -0.249 |
75 | Baylor | 65.849 | 4-8 | 70.544 | -1, -0.147 |
76 | Ohio U. | 65.387 | 9-5 | 62.178 | +0, +0.081 |
77 | Syracuse | 65.340 | 4-8 | 69.131 | +0, +0.089 |
78 | Bowling Green | 65.060 | 7-6 | 63.452 | +0, +0.222 |
79 | Marshall | 64.732 | 7-6 | 66.156 | +0, -0.031 |
80 | Wyoming | 64.425 | 7-6 | 68.329 | +0, -0.230 |
81 | Michigan | 64.334 | 5-7 | 65.254 | +1, +0.380 |
82 | Illinois | 64.096 | 3-9 | 69.115 | +1, +0.343 |
83 | Maryland | 63.883 | 2-10 | 70.812 | -2, -0.225 |
84 | Northern Illinois | 63.504 | 7-6 | 59.863 | +1, +0.146 |
85 | UNLV | 63.213 | 5-7 | 66.983 | -1, -0.150 |
86 | Alabama-Birmingham | 63.200 | 5-7 | 65.686 | +1, -0.056 |
87 | Colorado | 63.186 | 3-9 | 69.745 | -1, -0.107 |
88 | Indiana | 63.026 | 4-8 | 66.935 | +2, +0.381 |
89 | Vanderbilt | 62.976 | 2-10 | 71.299 | -1, -0.158 |
90 | Louisville | 62.833 | 4-8 | 68.509 | -1, -0.051 |
91 | Tulsa | 62.401 | 5-7 | 63.396 | +0, +0.023 |
92 | Utah St | 62.399 | 4-8 | 66.521 | +0, +0.324 |
93 | Idaho | 62.310 | 8-5 | 64.211 | +0, +0.293 |
94 | Buffalo | 61.846 | 5-7 | 62.019 | +1, +0.079 |
95 | Hawaii | 61.765 | 6-7 | 63.406 | +1, +0.334 |
96 | San Diego St | 61.690 | 4-8 | 66.127 | -2, -0.157 |
97 | UTEP | 61.375 | 4-8 | 63.061 | +0, -0.052 |
98 | Colorado St | 60.439 | 3-9 | 67.665 | +0, -0.119 |
99 | Florida Atlantic | 58.551 | 5-7 | 61.882 | +0, -0.052 |
100 | Kent St | 58.510 | 5-7 | 59.925 | +0, +0.081 |
101 | Western Michigan | 58.090 | 5-7 | 60.490 | +0, +0.155 |
102 | Louisiana-Monroe | 57.806 | 6-6 | 60.987 | +0, -0.023 |
103 | Toledo | 57.143 | 5-7 | 62.068 | +0, +0.120 |
104 | Memphis | 56.525 | 2-10 | 66.101 | +0, -0.052 |
105 | Army | 55.590 | 5-7 | 60.558 | +0, -0.038 |
106 | Arkansas St | 55.405 | 4-8 | 59.314 | +0, -0.075 |
106 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 55.405 | 6-6 | 60.609 | +1, -0.031 |
108 | Ball St | 54.263 | 2-10 | 61.830 | +0, +0.091 |
109 | Washington St | 54.241 | 1-11 | 72.134 | +0, +0.132 |
110 | Tulane | 54.054 | 3-9 | 65.043 | -1, -0.055 |
111 | Akron | 53.577 | 3-9 | 62.090 | +1, +0.139 |
112 | New Mexico | 53.416 | 1-11 | 68.766 | -1, -0.047 |
113 | Miami OH | 53.096 | 1-11 | 67.032 | +0, +0.143 |
114 | North Texas | 52.929 | 2-10 | 60.853 | +0, -0.017 |
115 | Rice | 52.851 | 2-10 | 66.969 | +0, -0.066 |
116 | San Jose St | 52.815 | 2-10 | 67.009 | +0, +0.237 |
117 | Florida Int'l | 52.340 | 3-9 | 65.020 | +0, -0.015 |
118 | New Mexico St | 50.934 | 3-10 | 64.241 | +0, +0.150 |
119 | Western Kentucky | 45.936 | 0-12 | 61.805 | +0, -0.020 |
120 | Eastern Michigan | 45.385 | 0-12 | 63.218 | +0, +0.101 |
Monday, January 4, 2010
NBA Rankings Through January 3rd
I've updated the NBA rankings on the Schmidt Computer Ratings website through yesterday's games.
The top 3 stay the same but Cleveland, Boston, and the Lakers are all within about 1.5 ratings points so they are close. Orlando and San Antonio move up a bit this week and are nipping at the heels of the Lakers.
I haven't spent the time to try to track the spreads for all the games and tune the computer to maximize the performance there, but am starting to and in the games I tracked last week the computer went 5-2 against the spread. The picks for tonight's games are:
Enjoy
The top 3 stay the same but Cleveland, Boston, and the Lakers are all within about 1.5 ratings points so they are close. Orlando and San Antonio move up a bit this week and are nipping at the heels of the Lakers.
I haven't spent the time to try to track the spreads for all the games and tune the computer to maximize the performance there, but am starting to and in the games I tracked last week the computer went 5-2 against the spread. The picks for tonight's games are:
- Miami +1.5 over Atlanta
- Ok City +2.5 over Chicago
- New Orleans +8 over Utah
- Portland +4 over the Clippers
Enjoy
Superbowl Odds
With the playoff teams finally nailed down and week 17 complete, the computer can now run its calculations to identify the chance of each team getting to and winning the Superbowl.
Interestingly, despite the Colts being ranked #8 now after the 2 losses, they are still the AFC favorite to get to the Superbowl and the #2 pick to win it. The getting to the Superbowl is due to having home field advantage throughout the playoffs and New Orleans benefits from that too with even a higher chance of getting to the Superbowl than the Colts.
As you might expect, the other teams with first round byes also are the other 2 with the best chance those being the Chargers and Vikings. The best of the rest are the Patriots and Dallas and the rest are pretty slim. But the chances for Arizona were pretty slim last year too.
Interestingly, despite the Colts being ranked #8 now after the 2 losses, they are still the AFC favorite to get to the Superbowl and the #2 pick to win it. The getting to the Superbowl is due to having home field advantage throughout the playoffs and New Orleans benefits from that too with even a higher chance of getting to the Superbowl than the Colts.
As you might expect, the other teams with first round byes also are the other 2 with the best chance those being the Chargers and Vikings. The best of the rest are the Patriots and Dallas and the rest are pretty slim. But the chances for Arizona were pretty slim last year too.
Team | Conference | Superbowl |
---|---|---|
New Orleans | 0.440 | 0.249 |
Indianapolis | 0.352 | 0.163 |
San Diego | 0.298 | 0.145 |
Minnesota | 0.242 | 0.117 |
New England | 0.153 | 0.079 |
Dallas | 0.140 | 0.077 |
NY Jets | 0.093 | 0.044 |
Green Bay | 0.080 | 0.040 |
Philadelphia | 0.052 | 0.026 |
Baltimore | 0.050 | 0.022 |
Cincinnati | 0.053 | 0.020 |
Arizona | 0.044 | 0.018 |
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Wildcard Weekend Preview
I'll likely post another entry as the lines get published and settle in, but I've posted early picks for wildcard weekend here.
In what I believe is a first, three of the four games are rematches of the final week of the season, two of those three even at the same location.
Green Bay goes back to Arizona where they just won 33-7 and based in large part on that win the computer picks them by 0.5. As Arizona sat starters, the 33-7 is probably not indicative of the real Arizona team, but did sitting starters ruin whatever momentum they had?
Philly goes back to Dallas where they just got hammered 24-0 and the computer likes Dallas to win again by 4.3. Philly had been moving up, so was this loss an aberation or is this the real Philly when playing at Dallas?
The Jets play Cincy again, but this time at the Bengals. The Bengals clearly didn't go all out so the 37-0 score isn't indicative, but that score does lead the computer to pick the Jets to pull the upset by a narrow 0.3. If the Bengals can pull it back together, clearly that isn't the right pick.
And in the only non-repeat game, Baltimore visits New England and the computer likes the home team by 5.4.
More to come later.
In what I believe is a first, three of the four games are rematches of the final week of the season, two of those three even at the same location.
Green Bay goes back to Arizona where they just won 33-7 and based in large part on that win the computer picks them by 0.5. As Arizona sat starters, the 33-7 is probably not indicative of the real Arizona team, but did sitting starters ruin whatever momentum they had?
Philly goes back to Dallas where they just got hammered 24-0 and the computer likes Dallas to win again by 4.3. Philly had been moving up, so was this loss an aberation or is this the real Philly when playing at Dallas?
The Jets play Cincy again, but this time at the Bengals. The Bengals clearly didn't go all out so the 37-0 score isn't indicative, but that score does lead the computer to pick the Jets to pull the upset by a narrow 0.3. If the Bengals can pull it back together, clearly that isn't the right pick.
And in the only non-repeat game, Baltimore visits New England and the computer likes the home team by 5.4.
More to come later.
End of Regular Season NFL Ratings/Ranking and Review
The regular season is now complete, and none too soon given the way some good teams packed it in the last few weeks. Teams resting starters wreaked havoc with the computer's picks the last few weeks, but the question now is if those teams can go back to where they were?
The latest rankings are below but always found here. And there are some changes. New Orleans somehow manages to stay #1 even though they lost over 1.2 ratings points as they had a big enough lead, and many of the other top teams also did poorly and dropped. New England was one of those dropping nearly a full ratings point but benefited by the Colts dropping over 2 points to stay #2, and Dallas jumps up to #3 with San Diego close behind at #4.
The question now is if the teams are rated where they should be. Indianapolis seems low at #8, but history shows that when they've rested folks they've been unable to get it back. Dallas and San Diego are finishing strong and getting rewarded for it. The Jets even with their finish have jumped to #7.
The whacky end of season games did result in the computer only going 8-8 against the spread. Here's hoping it does better in the playoffs more in line with the season record of 148-102-6. Full prediction performance shown here.
Look for an upcoming entry on wildcard weekend picks as well as Superbowl chances for each team. If you are interested in detailed playoff games previews, subscribe to the newsletter. See the bowl game previews for examples of what you'll get.
The latest rankings are below but always found here. And there are some changes. New Orleans somehow manages to stay #1 even though they lost over 1.2 ratings points as they had a big enough lead, and many of the other top teams also did poorly and dropped. New England was one of those dropping nearly a full ratings point but benefited by the Colts dropping over 2 points to stay #2, and Dallas jumps up to #3 with San Diego close behind at #4.
The question now is if the teams are rated where they should be. Indianapolis seems low at #8, but history shows that when they've rested folks they've been unable to get it back. Dallas and San Diego are finishing strong and getting rewarded for it. The Jets even with their finish have jumped to #7.
The whacky end of season games did result in the computer only going 8-8 against the spread. Here's hoping it does better in the playoffs more in line with the season record of 148-102-6. Full prediction performance shown here.
Look for an upcoming entry on wildcard weekend picks as well as Superbowl chances for each team. If you are interested in detailed playoff games previews, subscribe to the newsletter. See the bowl game previews for examples of what you'll get.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | New Orleans | 87.593 | 13-3 | 80.858 | +0, -1.208 |
2 | New England | 86.684 | 10-6 | 82.069 | +0, -0.908 |
3 | Dallas | 86.594 | 11-5 | 80.982 | +3, +0.984 |
4 | San Diego | 85.721 | 13-3 | 79.851 | +1, -0.569 |
5 | Philadelphia | 85.259 | 11-5 | 81.155 | -1, -1.176 |
6 | Green Bay | 85.158 | 11-5 | 78.809 | +3, +1.494 |
7 | NY Jets | 85.114 | 9-7 | 81.758 | +0, +0.722 |
8 | Indianapolis | 84.925 | 14-2 | 80.356 | -5, -2.149 |
9 | Minnesota | 84.673 | 12-4 | 78.875 | +1, +1.178 |
10 | Baltimore | 84.332 | 9-7 | 80.390 | -2, +0.207 |
11 | Atlanta | 83.990 | 9-7 | 82.562 | +0, +0.502 |
12 | Carolina | 83.967 | 8-8 | 82.992 | +0, +1.116 |
13 | Houston | 82.618 | 9-7 | 80.137 | +1, +0.346 |
14 | Pittsburgh | 82.156 | 9-7 | 80.025 | +5, +0.976 |
15 | Cincinnati | 81.782 | 10-6 | 80.467 | +0, -0.482 |
16 | Arizona | 81.692 | 10-6 | 78.647 | -3, -1.139 |
17 | San Francisco | 81.196 | 8-8 | 79.010 | +3, +0.068 |
18 | Miami | 80.933 | 7-9 | 83.173 | -1, -0.590 |
19 | Tennessee | 80.479 | 8-8 | 81.110 | +2, -0.267 |
20 | NY Giants | 80.477 | 8-8 | 82.180 | -2, -0.890 |
21 | Denver | 80.388 | 8-8 | 81.155 | -5, -1.739 |
22 | Buffalo | 80.351 | 6-10 | 82.443 | +0, +1.648 |
23 | Chicago | 78.332 | 7-9 | 79.968 | +2, +0.628 |
24 | Tampa Bay | 77.777 | 3-13 | 83.521 | -1, -0.344 |
25 | Washington | 77.371 | 4-12 | 80.887 | +1, +0.301 |
26 | Jacksonville | 77.247 | 7-9 | 80.523 | -2, -0.572 |
27 | Cleveland | 76.213 | 5-11 | 80.529 | +0, +0.825 |
28 | Kansas City | 75.812 | 4-12 | 80.851 | +2, +1.801 |
29 | Oakland | 74.811 | 5-11 | 81.610 | -1, -0.021 |
30 | Seattle | 74.288 | 5-11 | 79.568 | -1, -0.220 |
31 | St Louis | 70.037 | 1-15 | 80.137 | +0, -0.625 |
32 | Detroit | 69.438 | 2-14 | 80.812 | +0, -0.189 |
Saturday, January 2, 2010
2009/2010 Week 18 College Football Ratings/Rankings and Summary
Ratings through week 18 (games played thru 2-Jan). These are also at http://sites.google.com/site/computerratings/ncaa-football/ncaa-ratings.
30 games down, only 4 to go! And while there have been upsets and surprises in the games of the last week and there have been some big movers farther down in the rankings, the top-6 remain the same.
Alabama easily remains #1 although Florida did narrow the gap after dismantling Cincinnati in the Sugar Bowl. TCU stays #3 after moving to that spot last week after the early success of the Mountain West Conference in the bowls and in fact extends the lead over Texas. Virginia Tech and Arkansas both won their bowl games and keep their rankings, although VT did so impressively and improved their rating while Arkansas eked out their win and actually lost ratings points but narrowly stayed ahead of Boise State who moved up to #7 thanks to Cincinnati and Oregon both falling out of the top-10. Georgia Tech and Ohio State also benefited from those teams dropping.
The computer has continued the good performance against the spread and is now 19-11. A nice summary of the picks and performance is here. Full prediction performance for the year is here and if you are interested in a newsletter with additional details on picks against the spread, best picks, and locks, see this.
30 games down, only 4 to go! And while there have been upsets and surprises in the games of the last week and there have been some big movers farther down in the rankings, the top-6 remain the same.
Alabama easily remains #1 although Florida did narrow the gap after dismantling Cincinnati in the Sugar Bowl. TCU stays #3 after moving to that spot last week after the early success of the Mountain West Conference in the bowls and in fact extends the lead over Texas. Virginia Tech and Arkansas both won their bowl games and keep their rankings, although VT did so impressively and improved their rating while Arkansas eked out their win and actually lost ratings points but narrowly stayed ahead of Boise State who moved up to #7 thanks to Cincinnati and Oregon both falling out of the top-10. Georgia Tech and Ohio State also benefited from those teams dropping.
The computer has continued the good performance against the spread and is now 19-11. A nice summary of the picks and performance is here. Full prediction performance for the year is here and if you are interested in a newsletter with additional details on picks against the spread, best picks, and locks, see this.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | Alabama | 92.063 | 13-0 | 71.945 | +0, -0.012 |
2 | Florida | 88.347 | 13-1 | 71.694 | +0, +1.074 |
3 | TCU | 87.631 | 12-0 | 66.649 | +0, +0.598 |
4 | Texas | 85.906 | 13-0 | 69.109 | +0, -0.783 |
5 | Virginia Tech | 83.960 | 10-3 | 73.302 | +0, +1.227 |
6 | Arkansas | 80.753 | 8-5 | 72.532 | +0, -1.073 |
7 | Boise St | 80.607 | 13-0 | 61.621 | +3, -0.126 |
8 | Georgia Tech | 80.402 | 11-2 | 72.999 | +4, +0.271 |
9 | LSU | 80.353 | 9-4 | 72.886 | +0, -0.677 |
10 | Ohio State | 80.308 | 11-2 | 67.802 | +7, +2.257 |
11 | Oklahoma | 80.153 | 8-5 | 70.858 | +0, -0.529 |
12 | Cincinnati | 80.053 | 12-1 | 68.407 | -4, -1.172 |
13 | Oregon | 79.947 | 10-3 | 72.073 | -6, -1.561 |
14 | Nebraska | 79.313 | 10-4 | 69.191 | +2, +1.057 |
15 | Clemson | 78.804 | 9-5 | 71.330 | +0, +0.077 |
16 | Texas Tech | 78.553 | 9-4 | 67.803 | -2, -0.696 |
17 | Miami FL | 78.538 | 9-4 | 72.317 | -4, -0.818 |
18 | Mississippi | 78.378 | 9-4 | 70.066 | +0, +0.364 |
19 | Penn State | 78.181 | 11-2 | 65.999 | +5, +1.504 |
20 | Brigham Young | 77.938 | 11-2 | 68.155 | +2, +0.567 |
21 | Pittsburgh | 77.858 | 10-3 | 69.074 | -2, +0.151 |
22 | Stanford | 76.822 | 8-5 | 70.128 | -1, -0.614 |
23 | Auburn | 76.517 | 8-5 | 72.235 | +0, -0.843 |
24 | Utah | 76.426 | 10-3 | 67.206 | +3, +0.369 |
25 | Tennessee | 76.313 | 7-6 | 71.687 | -5, -1.265 |
26 | Connecticut | 76.035 | 8-5 | 69.325 | +9, +1.233 |
27 | North Carolina | 76.024 | 8-5 | 70.356 | +3, +0.396 |
28 | Iowa | 76.019 | 10-2 | 68.283 | +6, +0.865 |
29 | Southern Cal | 75.978 | 9-4 | 70.688 | -3, -0.315 |
30 | Georgia | 75.857 | 8-5 | 73.111 | +1, +0.576 |
31 | Oregon St | 75.514 | 8-5 | 69.872 | -3, -0.519 |
32 | Air Force | 74.620 | 8-5 | 65.889 | +13, +2.520 |
33 | Florida St | 74.606 | 7-6 | 73.780 | +6, +1.659 |
34 | Arizona | 74.591 | 8-5 | 71.385 | -9, -1.800 |
35 | Oklahoma St | 74.142 | 9-4 | 69.003 | -6, -1.881 |
36 | Mississippi St | 74.088 | 5-7 | 73.272 | +0, -0.356 |
37 | Wisconsin | 73.973 | 10-3 | 67.132 | +10, +2.196 |
38 | West Virginia | 73.952 | 9-4 | 69.928 | -6, -1.279 |
39 | Kentucky | 73.726 | 7-6 | 70.058 | -2, -0.294 |
40 | South Carolina | 73.718 | 7-6 | 73.855 | -7, -1.445 |
41 | Rutgers | 73.046 | 9-4 | 62.546 | -3, -0.002 |
42 | Navy | 72.320 | 10-4 | 65.906 | +12, +2.178 |
43 | Boston College | 72.135 | 8-5 | 69.459 | +3, +0.298 |
44 | California | 72.114 | 8-5 | 70.437 | -3, -0.395 |
45 | South Florida | 71.927 | 8-5 | 66.944 | +6, +0.819 |
46 | Wake Forest | 71.853 | 5-7 | 71.331 | +2, +0.307 |
47 | Central Michigan | 71.820 | 11-2 | 60.331 | -3, -0.346 |
48 | Notre Dame | 71.784 | 6-6 | 69.710 | +2, +0.455 |
49 | East Carolina | 71.113 | 9-5 | 67.771 | +3, +0.160 |
50 | Washington | 70.815 | 5-7 | 71.288 | -1, -0.515 |
51 | Houston | 70.739 | 10-4 | 64.413 | -11, -1.988 |
52 | Texas A&M | 70.623 | 6-7 | 69.883 | -10, -1.852 |
53 | UCLA | 70.385 | 7-6 | 70.694 | +0, -0.187 |
54 | Missouri | 70.381 | 8-5 | 68.579 | -11, -1.857 |
55 | Michigan St | 70.048 | 6-7 | 68.487 | +0, +0.719 |
56 | Troy | 68.518 | 9-3 | 62.468 | +0, -0.297 |
57 | Minnesota | 68.406 | 6-7 | 70.203 | +5, +0.821 |
58 | Kansas | 68.292 | 5-7 | 69.324 | -1, -0.426 |
59 | Virginia | 68.040 | 3-9 | 73.669 | +2, +0.246 |
60 | Nevada | 68.005 | 8-5 | 64.240 | +0, +0.169 |
61 | Northwestern | 67.930 | 8-5 | 64.487 | +12, +1.523 |
62 | Arizona St | 67.837 | 4-8 | 68.313 | -4, -0.568 |
63 | Middle Tennessee St | 67.817 | 10-3 | 60.557 | -4, -0.206 |
64 | Purdue | 67.438 | 5-7 | 68.094 | +7, +0.868 |
65 | Iowa St | 67.183 | 7-6 | 66.431 | -2, -0.370 |
66 | Fresno St | 67.090 | 8-5 | 65.070 | +2, +0.417 |
67 | Kansas St | 66.853 | 6-6 | 67.163 | -3, -0.635 |
68 | Central Florida | 66.755 | 8-5 | 65.226 | -3, -0.485 |
69 | Duke | 66.636 | 5-7 | 68.286 | +3, +0.138 |
70 | SMU | 66.618 | 8-5 | 64.614 | -3, -0.120 |
71 | Southern Miss | 66.537 | 7-6 | 62.703 | -5, -0.349 |
72 | North Carolina St | 66.477 | 5-7 | 67.613 | +2, +0.245 |
73 | Temple | 66.285 | 9-4 | 61.351 | -4, -0.378 |
74 | Baylor | 65.996 | 4-8 | 70.709 | -4, -0.616 |
75 | Louisiana Tech | 65.834 | 4-8 | 65.280 | +2, +0.393 |
76 | Ohio U. | 65.306 | 9-5 | 62.103 | +0, -0.327 |
77 | Syracuse | 65.251 | 4-8 | 69.023 | +2, +0.295 |
78 | Bowling Green | 64.838 | 7-6 | 63.169 | -3, -0.812 |
79 | Marshall | 64.763 | 7-6 | 66.197 | -1, -0.331 |
80 | Wyoming | 64.655 | 7-6 | 68.695 | +0, +0.359 |
81 | Maryland | 64.108 | 2-10 | 71.030 | +1, +0.236 |
82 | Michigan | 63.954 | 5-7 | 64.803 | +5, +0.928 |
83 | Illinois | 63.753 | 3-9 | 68.793 | +3, +0.670 |
84 | UNLV | 63.363 | 5-7 | 67.259 | +5, +0.562 |
85 | Northern Illinois | 63.358 | 7-6 | 59.706 | -4, -0.863 |
86 | Colorado | 63.293 | 3-9 | 69.907 | -3, -0.566 |
87 | Alabama-Birmingham | 63.256 | 5-7 | 65.736 | -3, -0.365 |
88 | Vanderbilt | 63.134 | 2-10 | 71.420 | -3, -0.152 |
89 | Louisville | 62.884 | 4-8 | 68.557 | -1, +0.025 |
90 | Indiana | 62.645 | 4-8 | 66.518 | +4, +0.867 |
91 | Tulsa | 62.378 | 5-7 | 63.243 | -1, -0.316 |
92 | Utah St | 62.075 | 4-8 | 66.200 | +1, +0.258 |
93 | Idaho | 62.017 | 8-5 | 63.832 | +2, +0.624 |
94 | San Diego St | 61.847 | 4-8 | 66.408 | +2, +0.506 |
95 | Buffalo | 61.767 | 5-7 | 61.953 | -4, -0.317 |
96 | Hawaii | 61.431 | 6-7 | 63.009 | +1, +0.632 |
97 | UTEP | 61.427 | 4-8 | 63.175 | -5, -0.432 |
98 | Colorado St | 60.558 | 3-9 | 67.963 | +0, +0.506 |
99 | Florida Atlantic | 58.603 | 5-7 | 61.940 | +0, -0.196 |
100 | Kent St | 58.429 | 5-7 | 59.857 | +0, -0.288 |
101 | Western Michigan | 57.935 | 5-7 | 60.320 | +1, -0.064 |
102 | Louisiana-Monroe | 57.829 | 6-6 | 61.085 | -1, -0.228 |
103 | Toledo | 57.023 | 5-7 | 61.920 | +0, -0.239 |
104 | Memphis | 56.577 | 2-10 | 66.145 | +0, -0.419 |
105 | Army | 55.628 | 5-7 | 60.596 | +2, +0.142 |
106 | Arkansas St | 55.480 | 4-8 | 59.176 | -1, -0.169 |
107 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 55.436 | 6-6 | 60.630 | -1, -0.207 |
108 | Ball St | 54.172 | 2-10 | 61.739 | +0, -0.278 |
109 | Tulane | 54.109 | 3-9 | 65.103 | +0, -0.337 |
109 | Washington St | 54.109 | 1-11 | 71.987 | +1, -0.262 |
111 | New Mexico | 53.463 | 1-11 | 69.115 | +3, +0.339 |
112 | Akron | 53.438 | 3-9 | 61.931 | -1, -0.179 |
113 | Miami OH | 52.953 | 1-11 | 66.688 | -1, -0.316 |
114 | North Texas | 52.946 | 2-10 | 60.764 | +1, -0.176 |
115 | Rice | 52.917 | 2-10 | 67.045 | -2, -0.271 |
116 | San Jose St | 52.578 | 2-10 | 66.617 | +1, +0.326 |
117 | Florida Int'l | 52.355 | 3-9 | 64.922 | -1, -0.221 |
118 | New Mexico St | 50.784 | 3-10 | 63.850 | +0, +0.308 |
119 | Western Kentucky | 45.956 | 0-12 | 61.825 | +0, -0.139 |
120 | Eastern Michigan | 45.284 | 0-12 | 63.060 | +0, -0.173 |
Friday, January 1, 2010
New Years Day 2010 Bowl Previews
Happy New Year and welcome to 2010. While television has saddled us with only 5 games (same as last year but down from 6 the few years before that and more in the "olden days"), there are a few good ones. The full previews newsletter subscribers got earlier this week will be posted around game time, but here is a short synopsis on each game.
The day kicks off with the Outback Bowl and Auburn favored big over Northwestern. Even with the line growing to 8 or 9, the computer says it isn't enough picking Auburn by over 10.
Next up is LSU and Penn State in the Capital One Bowl where PSU was favored by 3 early but now it appears as a pick'em or even LSU by 1. The computer liked LSU from the start, having the margin over 4 so I hope you got the early +3!
Florida State and West Virginia go at it in the Gator Bowl with WVU the 2 to 3 point pick and the computer agrees, the margin having been predicted to be right around 2.5 the whole bowl season.
In the grandaddy of them all, Oregon and Ohio State go head to head and Oregon is the Vegas pick by around 4 and early that was the computer's pick too, but with the Pac-10 underachieving a bit the pick is now down under 3.
And in the Sugar Bowl, Cincinnati tries to stay undefeated against a Florida team with a whole host of emotions in play and the Vegas line of 13 is way too high according to the computer, it pegging it at around 6. But how will Cincinnati play with an acting head coach?
That's it for now. Follow @computerratings on Twitter for more tidbits throughout the day.
The day kicks off with the Outback Bowl and Auburn favored big over Northwestern. Even with the line growing to 8 or 9, the computer says it isn't enough picking Auburn by over 10.
Next up is LSU and Penn State in the Capital One Bowl where PSU was favored by 3 early but now it appears as a pick'em or even LSU by 1. The computer liked LSU from the start, having the margin over 4 so I hope you got the early +3!
Florida State and West Virginia go at it in the Gator Bowl with WVU the 2 to 3 point pick and the computer agrees, the margin having been predicted to be right around 2.5 the whole bowl season.
In the grandaddy of them all, Oregon and Ohio State go head to head and Oregon is the Vegas pick by around 4 and early that was the computer's pick too, but with the Pac-10 underachieving a bit the pick is now down under 3.
And in the Sugar Bowl, Cincinnati tries to stay undefeated against a Florida team with a whole host of emotions in play and the Vegas line of 13 is way too high according to the computer, it pegging it at around 6. But how will Cincinnati play with an acting head coach?
That's it for now. Follow @computerratings on Twitter for more tidbits throughout the day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)