This weekend has four events, 18 & Over 2.5W and 5.0 in Scottsdale, 3.5 in Surprise, and 4.0 in San Diego.
I've been doing simulations since 2018 and have found that the four semi-finalists are usually in the top six to seven projected teams, and more often than you might think, I project the four semi-finalists perfectly. There are surprises sometimes and a mid-pack team overachieves and advances, that is why the matches are played on the courts and not on a computer. Still, it is interesting to do these simulations and see how the projections do.
Why do these simulations you ask? The primary reason is that the format for USTA League Nationals is now a flight-less random round-robin where each team plays four other random opponents. This introduces significant variations in schedule strength, the possibility of an undefeated team not making the top-4, and teams vying for the top-4 perhaps not having played head-to-head and unfortunate tie-breakers being used. The simulations aim to educate folks on how it all works and look at what may happen. Also see this write-up for some things to know about Nationals.
Because of the fairly compressed schedule, I likely won't have the time to do previews/simulations of all events, but will try to do a few. Let me know which you'd like to see!
Like I did last year, I'll be primarily just giving the data from the simulation and not writing a bunch of words. Most of it is self-explanatory, but the favorites and contenders will be listed in alphabetical order. The strengths are based on played averages. Contact me if you want to learn more.
On to the projections from the simulation, I already did the 18 & Over 4.0 men, 3.5 women, and 4.0 women, next up, the 18 & Over 3.5 men.
Chance of 4 undefeated: 1%
Chance of 5 undefeated: <1%
Strongest / weakest team strength: 3.83 / 3.51
Toughest / easiest schedule: 3.73 / 3.61
Favorites: Florida, NorCal, Texas
Contenders: Caribbean, Eastern, Middle States, Northern, PNW, SoCal, Southwest
The simulation likes three teams above the others, and one of those a near lock to make the semis, just that one having a most likely record of 4-0 (62% chance). And in a very rare occurrence, the last semi-finalist is projected to be 2-2 with 10 teams having that record. Now, it is likely that with so many teams having a most likely 2-2 record, one steps up and finishes 3-1, but clearly this is a close competition for that last spot.
What do you think?

Intermountain?
ReplyDeleteJust on the outside of "have a chance", but with the format change, anything can happen.
DeleteAdd in now that it's moved to Short sets No-AD it can change things drastically
ReplyDeleteYep.
DeleteIntermountain is always underrated from a weaker section. But they play a ton of matches. Also hard to believe southern isn't a contender from such a tough section and so many vetted.
ReplyDeleteSome teams are crazy strong and deep on paper. And Southern has one of the tougher schedules. We'll see how it plays out.
DeleteSoCal Nationals Champs 💪
ReplyDeleteCongrats SoCal! Well played!!
ReplyDelete