Tuesday, March 15, 2011

March Madness Pre-Tournament Rankings

College basketball takes a lot more time to do rankings for so all of you have probably noticed the silence on this blog.  But with the NCAA Basketball Tournament starting shortly I had to make the time to get current rankings through the games played Sunday the 13th.

So here they are.  And it is interesting to make a few observations.

The 1 seeds are the top-4 in my rankings so things line up there but things aren't so clear with the 2's.  Only San Diego State should be a 2 with Notre Dame close at #9 but UNC and Florida are way down at #15 and #18.  Are they the 2's most likely to lose early?

Who was robbed?  Texas should be a 2 but is only a 4, Kentucky the same, and Purdue is close as a 3.

I'll be filling out a bracket using these rankings so lets see how they do compared to other polls and systems.  Stay tuned.

RankTeamRatingRecordScheduleChange
RankTeamRatingRecordScheduleChange
1Ohio State78.13732-264.392+0, -0.628
2Kansas76.97132-264.229+0, -0.146
3Duke76.69930-464.348+2, +1.032
4Pittsburgh75.35427-564.387-1, -0.491
5Texas75.07727-764.243+1, -0.233
6San Diego St74.79330-264.132+3, +0.885
7Kentucky74.30825-864.312+4, +1.008
8Purdue74.24625-765.138-4, -1.496
9Notre Dame73.59926-665.037+4, +0.518
10Brigham Young73.52429-463.562-3, -1.172
11Wisconsin73.32623-865.185-3, -0.631
12Louisville73.32425-964.647+3, +0.981
13Syracuse73.20126-765.100-1, -0.089
14Connecticut72.89126-966.186+9, +1.747
15North Carolina72.52726-765.738-5, -0.783
16Washington71.86623-1064.017+3, +0.026
17Cincinnati71.72925-863.064-3, -0.775
18Florida71.69326-763.971+0, -0.156
19West Virginia71.63520-1167.199-2, -0.495
20Utah St71.59229-360.057-4, -0.651
21Georgetown DC70.64821-1067.289-1, -0.822
22Illinois70.60319-1365.930+0, -0.553
23Marquette70.44221-1464.803+3, -0.039
24Kansas St70.38021-1064.533-3, -0.963
25UNLV70.20424-863.504+5, -0.011
26Arizona70.03927-763.527+3, -0.186
26Clemson70.03921-1162.884+9, +0.387
28Belmont69.95430-457.324+3, -0.190
29St John's NY69.91521-1266.456-4, -0.745
30George Mason69.83126-660.307+2, -0.214
30Temple69.83125-761.952+4, -0.133
32Xavier OH69.69724-762.283-5, -0.602
33Missouri69.64722-1063.031-9, -1.284
34Villanova69.61621-1165.280-6, -0.621
35Richmond69.17227-760.997+4, +0.538
36Vanderbilt69.15723-1063.424-3, -0.832
37Michigan68.99819-1365.780+3, +0.425
38Texas A&M68.92623-862.729+3, +0.439
39Gonzaga68.69623-961.071+5, +0.491
40New Mexico68.44020-1262.899-3, -0.312
41Virginia Tech68.42621-1163.420+1, +0.019
42Penn St68.38119-1466.637+19, +1.077
43Butler68.36422-962.221+3, +0.360
44Florida St68.36021-1063.076-6, -0.289
45Southern Cal68.32219-1464.565+0, +0.158
46Michigan St68.23718-1467.010+2, +0.413
47Old Dominion68.20027-660.885-4, -0.081
48UCLA67.98322-1063.630-12, -1.363
49Colorado67.94520-1363.246+8, +0.537
50Oakland67.64324-960.636+17, +0.769
51Washington St67.63819-1263.319-1, -0.149
52St Mary's CA67.41023-860.545-5, -0.440
53Harvard67.33221-660.200-2, -0.286
54Seton Hall67.32113-1866.252-5, -0.469
55Nebraska67.23919-1261.482-3, -0.357
56Tennessee67.22319-1464.770-2, -0.344
57New Orleans67.1267-258.604+1, -0.225
58Northwestern67.09618-1364.159+12, +0.602
59Alabama67.07721-1161.008+3, -0.194
60Maryland67.07519-1462.562+0, -0.254
61Iona66.93722-1159.324-8, -0.634
62Miami FL66.82819-1463.581+7, +0.245
63Georgia66.81521-1162.975+1, -0.318
64Wichita St66.79423-858.827+1, -0.163
65Alabama-Birmingham66.74422-861.088-9, -0.697
66Duquesne66.66917-1260.949-11, -0.799
67Cleveland St66.56924-861.212+1, -0.141
68Boston College66.43120-1263.858-9, -0.902
69California66.42217-1464.987-6, -0.774
70Minnesota66.38417-1465.450-4, -0.536
71UTEP66.29224-959.888+0, +0.059
72Oklahoma St66.03419-1363.776+5, +0.417
73Southern Miss65.93619-1060.792-1, -0.086
74Colorado St65.70618-1263.591-1, -0.270
75Rutgers65.54715-1764.781+5, +0.600
76Marshall65.49720-1161.239-2, -0.384
77Princeton65.42024-659.977+5, +0.557
78VA Commonwealth65.34823-1161.391-2, -0.306
79Bucknell65.07825-858.571+2, +0.135
80Missouri St65.04925-859.669-1, -0.170
81Coll of Charleston65.04124-1059.275-6, -0.769
82Mississippi64.86120-1361.453+3, +0.232
83Boise St64.75319-1260.471+6, +0.389
84Morehead St64.45722-958.052+0, -0.235
85Tulsa64.43319-1361.474+1, -0.156
86Baylor64.41717-1362.053-8, -1.049
87Memphis64.25325-960.887+17, +1.136
88Valparaiso64.24821-1160.984+0, -0.241
89Wofford64.17921-1259.176+3, +0.326
90LIU-Brooklyn64.17127-556.758-3, -0.388
91Long Beach St64.12020-1161.379-8, -0.610
92Iowa St63.87416-1662.116-2, -0.144
93Fairfield63.73224-757.681+0, -0.064
94Oregon63.67515-1763.517+12, +0.753
95Virginia63.62616-1562.458-4, -0.374
96James Madison63.53521-1160.575-2, -0.181
97Indiana63.40012-2064.085+0, -0.263
98Dayton63.32422-1361.800+11, +0.447
99Kent St63.26622-1159.552+16, +0.534
100Portland63.24620-1160.900+1, -0.059
101Providence RI63.18615-1763.540-5, -0.492
102Iowa63.17211-2064.682-3, -0.205
102Stanford63.17215-1662.431-7, -0.511
104Rider63.07623-1058.852-2, -0.203
105North Carolina St62.99715-1663.208-7, -0.393
106Air Force62.96114-1462.786-6, -0.382
107Texas Tech62.86113-1962.941+5, +0.062
108Drexel62.77521-1060.580-1, -0.124
109Georgia Tech62.75013-1862.834-6, -0.514
109St Peter's62.75020-1360.341+13, +0.275
111Coastal Carolina62.62124-556.068+0, -0.239
112Arkansas62.61718-1360.086-2, -0.251
113East Tennessee St62.61521-1159.071+0, -0.156
114Montana62.52919-1058.959+13, +0.207
115Creighton62.42719-1459.152+5, -0.116
116Indiana St62.42419-1361.059+1, -0.233
117Northern Colorado62.41419-1058.559-1, -0.258
118Wright St62.40717-1460.934+0, -0.185
119UW-Milwaukee62.31719-1361.779-14, -0.708
120Oral Roberts62.29119-1559.734-1, -0.296
121Akron62.26022-1258.678+16, +0.579
122Hofstra62.25820-1160.737-1, -0.236
123Mississippi St62.24017-1460.937+1, -0.159
124UC-Santa Barbara62.22216-1360.132+31, +1.515
125Northern Iowa62.13518-1360.365+1, -0.198
126South Florida62.12110-2365.863+2, -0.121
127Buffalo62.03617-1358.317-13, -0.702
128Northern Arizona62.03217-1258.240+3, -0.119
129Oklahoma62.01814-1763.503+15, +0.715
130Central Florida62.01118-1160.549-22, -0.870
131Murray St61.97521-856.776-1, -0.197
132Rhode Island61.83919-1361.091+0, -0.237
133Detroit Mercy61.80016-1661.112+1, -0.183
134South Dakota St61.74317-1257.538-11, -0.724
135Arizona St61.72312-1964.163-6, -0.496
136Idaho61.71317-1359.923-11, -0.671
137Winston-Salem61.48016-859.378-1, -0.322
138New Mexico St61.46914-1761.859-5, -0.555
139IUPUI61.40917-1460.666-4, -0.478
140UNC-Asheville61.34716-1358.460+0, -0.234
141Utah61.33912-1864.729+1, -0.196
142East Carolina61.31215-1561.666+12, +0.522
143Vermont61.30423-856.754+0, -0.218
144St Louis U.61.25711-1961.743-6, -0.411
145Austin Peay61.06718-1358.709+0, -0.180
146South Carolina61.05714-1662.716-7, -0.583
147San Francisco61.01615-1461.720+2, -0.001
148Furman60.99120-1058.129-2, -0.239
149St Bonaventure60.97716-1461.069-8, -0.570
150Ohio U.60.79418-1558.296-3, -0.395
151Santa Clara60.78917-1459.551+0, -0.072
152Nevada60.74612-1961.477+1, -0.046
153Robert Morris PA60.72618-1460.025+3, +0.036
154Central Connecticut St60.63119-1257.019-2, -0.205
155SMU60.51114-1458.190+2, -0.092
156Hawaii60.50917-1258.780-6, -0.374
157Loyola-Chicago60.33016-1559.036+1, -0.173
158Lipscomb60.22616-1359.257+3, -0.166
159Rice60.16312-1861.097+4, -0.202
160American U.60.16222-957.596+1, -0.230
161George Washington60.00717-1459.878-13, -1.053
162Quinnipiac59.99822-955.914+5, -0.190
163UW-Green Bay59.96913-1861.997+3, -0.245
164Western Michigan59.85619-1257.842+1, -0.392
165Pacific CA59.84814-1560.252-6, -0.646
166Davidson59.83516-1458.835+3, -0.243
167Cal Poly SLO59.75215-1459.367-7, -0.684
168Oregon St59.72711-2062.366+8, +0.064
169La Salle59.61015-1860.410+3, -0.184
170Boston U.59.56021-1357.545+4, -0.201
171Fresno St59.53513-1760.594-3, -0.621
172North Texas59.51520-1156.336+11, +0.316
173TCU59.47311-2262.445+12, +0.342
174Jacksonville FL59.47018-1157.932+3, -0.181
175Miami OH59.40515-1662.383-2, -0.371
176Sam Houston St59.39314-1357.685+2, -0.086
177Ball St59.38018-1257.643-6, -0.419
178San Jose St59.35016-1560.288+12, +0.638
179Weber St59.26515-1359.367-15, -1.085
180North Dakota St59.22812-1558.082-1, -0.219
181Pennsylvania59.14213-1560.215-6, -0.612
182Florida Atlantic59.11819-1058.538-2, -0.199
183Massachusetts59.10514-1560.940-13, -0.889
184Lehigh59.09716-1558.077-2, -0.150
185Yale59.07214-1359.554-4, -0.229
186Cornell NY58.89410-1860.350+0, -0.181
187Canisius58.89215-1558.599+0, -0.170
188St Joseph's PA58.88411-2262.841+19, +1.318
189Loyola-Maryland58.84915-1558.621-1, -0.153
190Arkansas St58.70215-1558.081+1, +0.053
191Evansville58.68614-1560.569-2, -0.222
192McNeese St58.38617-1156.667+5, +0.121
193Middle Tennessee St58.35915-1656.782-9, -0.778
194IPFW58.34217-1257.125-2, -0.292
195Northeastern58.24811-2061.371-2, -0.209
196Western Carolina58.21917-1558.979-2, -0.178
197St Francis NY58.07815-1557.249-1, -0.208
198Hampton58.01223-853.632+13, +0.554
199Bradley57.91411-2059.921+2, -0.176
200Columbia NY57.91114-1358.381-1, -0.207
201DePaul57.8467-2464.477-3, -0.354
202Tulane57.81310-1759.341-7, -0.488
203VMI57.75114-1357.233-1, -0.172
204Tennessee Tech57.62417-1256.670-1, -0.200
205Lafayette57.60112-1959.171-5, -0.499
206Delaware57.40214-1761.047-1, -0.230
207Mercer57.36414-1858.565+1, -0.194
208Liberty57.35216-1357.508+1, -0.197
209Maine57.27014-1556.879+1, -0.220
210Charleston Southern57.22512-1657.897+2, -0.221
211Loyola Marymount57.2009-2160.007+6, -0.089
212North Florida57.19315-1961.150+1, -0.217
213Appalachian St57.18014-1558.769+1, -0.192
214Winthrop57.17211-1758.673+2, -0.161
215William & Mary57.1589-2260.977+0, -0.212
216Texas-San Antonio57.14816-1356.671+21, +0.796
217CSU-Northridge57.14512-1859.672+1, -0.108
218Siena57.11213-1859.615+1, -0.134
219Arkansas-Little Rock57.07417-1657.871+17, +0.567
220Drake57.01213-1859.444+0, -0.212
221Charlotte56.99610-2061.331+1, -0.188
222UNC-Wilmington56.96313-1859.683-2, -0.261
223Holy Cross MA56.8758-2158.759+0, -0.229
224Western Kentucky56.85916-1657.754-20, -0.783
225Stephen F. Austin56.85414-1154.989-19, -0.760
226UC-Irvine56.82512-1958.832-1, -0.168
227Georgia St56.75612-1959.032-1, -0.210
228Houston56.72310-1859.988-1, -0.168
229Wagner56.65913-1759.634+0, -0.124
230Pepperdine56.61811-2160.796+0, -0.124
231Bowling Green56.59713-1958.602+0, -0.102
232Auburn56.56410-2059.664-8, -0.434
233Stony Brook56.54814-1756.850+2, +0.040
234Denver56.50213-1757.322-1, -0.070
235Louisiana-Lafayette56.47613-1457.231-3, -0.185
236Wyoming56.3198-2162.004-8, -0.519
237Southern Illinois56.27313-1959.929-3, -0.236
238Brown56.14910-1758.816+0, -0.195
239LSU55.90111-2160.107+2, -0.130
240Louisiana Tech55.88911-2060.002+0, -0.199
241UC-Davis55.8338-2059.355-2, -0.259
242Albany NY55.80016-1656.948+1, -0.196
243Tennessee St55.75912-1658.077-1, -0.264
244Mt St Mary's MD55.64811-2159.468+3, -0.145
245Eastern Kentucky55.64013-1656.527+0, -0.210
246Elon55.59411-1758.203+0, -0.241
247Morgan St55.54117-1455.143+16, +0.655
248Lamar55.4759-1756.833+4, -0.085
249Illinois St55.44212-1958.036+0, -0.190
250Montana St55.39311-1858.889+0, -0.236
251Nicholls St55.31210-1457.699+0, -0.311
252Presbyterian55.24413-1859.595+2, -0.212
253Texas St-San Marcos55.21914-1555.993+3, -0.094
254SE Louisiana St55.13312-1457.250-1, -0.347
255Utah Valley St55.12015-1153.181-11, -0.830
256Coppin St55.01813-1455.660-8, -0.737
257Southern Utah54.93910-1857.821+1, -0.223
258Navy54.88710-2058.021-1, -0.284
259Northwestern St54.87116-1355.358+3, -0.032
260Illinois-Chicago54.8616-2461.705-1, -0.231
261Chattanooga54.76014-1658.706+0, -0.195
262Eastern Washington54.7188-2059.374-2, -0.246
263Savannah St54.7148-1860.307+10, +0.488
264Gardner-Webb54.5599-2159.874+0, -0.171
265CSU-Fullerton54.49810-2058.678-10, -0.821
266Texas-Arlington54.4729-1657.205+1, -0.030
267Sacred Heart54.46211-1857.300-2, -0.199
268UC-Riverside54.37210-1959.930+9, +0.302
269Campbell54.30111-1957.429-1, -0.189
270Portland St54.25513-1657.033+12, +0.467
271St Francis PA54.2479-2159.403-2, -0.200
272Youngstown St54.2147-2160.949-1, -0.187
273UMKC54.18015-1457.045-3, -0.264
274Wake Forest53.8758-2462.165+1, -0.249
275Monmouth NJ53.8079-2157.892+3, -0.173
276Central Michigan53.7879-2158.587-2, -0.396
277Seattle U.53.62911-2058.916-11, -1.019
278Army53.59510-1957.857+2, -0.227
279Texas Southern53.59119-1254.483-7, -0.714
280Troy53.5747-2159.347+1, -0.220
281Hartford53.38511-2057.064+2, -0.394
282The Citadel53.3468-2258.855+4, -0.165
283Bethune-Cookman53.25417-1254.577-4, -0.578
284Northern Illinois53.2268-2158.538-9, -0.898
285Florida Gulf Coast53.21710-2058.115+2, -0.236
286Alabama St53.16515-1753.596+24, +1.272
287Towson53.1254-2660.438+1, -0.206
288Florida Int'l53.0249-1957.234+0, -0.307
289Jackson St53.00815-1553.797-4, -0.567
289UNC-Greensboro53.0087-2459.519+1, -0.166
291New Hampshire52.78611-1857.125+2, -0.204
292Fordham52.7487-2161.137+2, -0.219
293Eastern Michigan52.7136-2258.236-2, -0.353
294South Dakota52.67814-1553.021+2, -0.135
295Niagara NY52.6209-2359.144+0, -0.201
296San Diego52.6124-2461.615+1, -0.179
297Norfolk St52.58012-2056.043-5, -0.448
298North Carolina A&T52.49212-1757.007-14, -1.116
299SE Missouri St52.4469-2257.481-1, -0.202
300South Alabama52.39110-1656.899+1, -0.167
301Jacksonville St52.3684-2557.789-1, -0.214
302Tennessee-Martin52.22910-2157.724+0, -0.188
303Bryant52.1548-2159.532+1, -0.190
304Idaho St52.0887-2059.726+1, -0.249
305North Dakota51.99415-1454.047-6, -0.618
306Stetson51.9878-2258.485+0, -0.127
307Manhattan51.7736-2559.761+2, -0.180
308High Point51.76510-1958.172+0, -0.214
309Eastern Illinois51.7487-2057.558-2, -0.259
310Colgate51.6237-2358.682+2, -0.206
311North Carolina Central51.24611-1555.655-8, -1.120
312Binghamton51.1648-2357.596+4, -0.194
313New Jersey Tech51.15711-1553.874-2, -0.681
314CSU-Bakersfield51.1479-1958.371+1, -0.237
315Mississippi Valley St51.12313-1956.213-2, -0.573
316Samford51.02010-1957.545+1, -0.168
317Marist50.7906-2760.056+1, -0.180
318Sacramento St50.6055-2158.189+1, -0.204
319Delaware St50.5807-2157.415-5, -0.865
320Kennesaw St50.5757-2358.222+1, -0.158
321TAMU-Corpus Christi50.5107-2159.237+1, -0.069
322Longwood50.3678-1958.392+1, -0.208
323Dartmouth50.1035-2359.851+1, -0.201
324Alabama A&M49.77710-1552.847-4, -0.972
325Fairleigh Dickinson49.7535-2457.882+0, -0.164
326SC-Upstate49.7335-2560.164+0, -0.179
327Louisiana-Monroe48.9665-2457.724+1, -0.137
328Florida A&M48.6708-2055.271-1, -0.651
329Grambling St48.23212-2153.945+1, +0.119
330South Carolina St48.1936-2254.907-1, -0.613
331Radford47.6392-2459.805+1, -0.213
332MD-Eastern Shore47.4777-2256.229-1, -0.596
333Toledo47.4273-2859.408+0, -0.326
334Georgia Southern47.3152-2758.478+1, -0.195
335Prairie View A&M47.1917-2255.101-1, -0.551
336Western Illinois47.1574-2357.833+0, -0.202
337MD-Baltimore County46.8955-2558.263+0, -0.196
338Arkansas-Pine Bluff46.3987-2456.244+0, -0.159
339Texas-Pan American45.7433-2555.834+1, +0.121
340Howard45.5596-2455.426-1, -0.883
341Houston Baptist45.3855-2454.267+1, +0.529
342Central Arkansas45.3222-2457.273-1, -0.093
343SIU-Edwardsville44.5034-2158.057+0, -0.210
344Alcorn St43.7374-2456.179+0, -0.220
345Centenary LA43.1931-2759.215+0, -0.224
346Chicago St42.7324-2557.227+0, +0.172
347Southern U.41.4473-2454.299+0, -0.219

Sunday, January 16, 2011

The computer goes to 5-1 against the spread in the playoffs; Today's Seahawks/Bears and Jets/Patriots picks

With Pittsburgh's and Green Bay's wins yesterday, the computer is now 5-1 picking games against the spread in the playoffs.  In fact, it is doing better against the spread than winners, 5-1 vs 4-2, although picking winners it is handily beating Vegas which is only 2-4.

Last week, the computer went 3-1 barely missing on only Kansas City +3 (computer had Baltimore by 2.8), but nailing Seattle +11.5 (complete analysis actually showed a good chance of a Seattle win), Green Bay +3 (computer did pick the upset in fact), and the Jets +3 (also picked the upset).

In today's games New England is a 10 point favorite but the computer likes them by only 7.4, and Chicago is up to a 10-11 point pick but the computer says that isn't enough having it at 11.6.

Could Seattle pull the upset again?  After all, they won in Chicago earlier in the year!

Their performance chart shows the 2nd Saints game continued their earlier trend of being good or bad, no individual game performance overlapping their current rating.  So, it is reasonable to think that they will again play very well or very bad.  The problem this week is that 6 of their 8 road games were bad, the good ones being at Chicago and Arizona.  Of their 8 good games, 6 were at home.  So it is less likely that the "good" Seattle shows up this week than the last two.

But if the good Seattle shows up, that team has an average rating of 86.9, they are playing a Chicago team with an 84.8 rating so perhaps they have a chance.  Especially since Chicago has played worse at home than on the road with 3 of their 4 losses at home and an average rating of 81.9 at home vs 87.4 on the road.







New England on the other hand has been far and away the best team the latter part of the year, only getting better each week the last 7 weeks.  The Jets have been good, but can clearly have a down game as happened last time they visited the Pats and the following week hosting Miami.

At home the Pats rating averages 90.6, right about their overall rating and the Jets on the road are 85.9, just below their overall rating.  So nothing other than a worse than normal Patriots and a great game by the Jets points to a Jets win.  But that is why they play the game.



Saturday, January 15, 2011

Green Bay at Atlanta Preview

Green Bay plays at Atlanta on 1/15 in a playoff game.

Green Bay is ranked #2 by the computer with a 11-6 record and a rating of 88.161 against a schedule strength of 82.575.  Their performance chart can be found below and shows they were quite up and down in stretches, their worst game being against Miami and best game being against the Giants.  They are 9-7 against the spread this year and the computer is 9-7 picking their games against the spread and 10-6 picking winners in their games.

chart?chs=800x375&cht=lc&chco=000000,0000FF,00FF00,FF0000,00FFFF,FFFF00&chxt=x,y&chls=0|1|0|0|1|0&chdl=Current|Weekly|Win|Loss|Schedule|Opponent&chdlp=t&chds=50,110&chtt=2 Green_Bay 88.161&chd=t:-1,92.993,94.339,83.769,81.856,77.424,74.784,82.229,97.760,96.140,-1,96.400,84.843,90.032,79.856,88.918,98.254,89.769,91.393|84.738,87.105,89.369,89.159,85.632,83.536,81.871,81.974,84.683,84.879,85.778,87.283,87.078,87.336,86.238,86.544,87.642,87.850,88.161|-1|-1|79.316,84.836,78.888,82.383,78.461,79.510,79.460,79.269,81.040,79.603,80.415,81.014,81.762,81.140,81.178,82.211,82.307,82.319,82.575|-1,82.992,78.553,84.768,81.863,78.425,81.590,80.242,86.572,79.860,-1,80.242,85.846,77.021,81.863,90.928,82.241,84.768,82.992&chxl=0:||@PHI|BUF|@CHI|DET|@WAS|MIA|MIN|@NYJ|DAL|bye|@MIN|@ATL|SFO|@DET|@NWE|NYG|CHI|@PHI|1:|50|60|70|80|90|100|110&chm=o,00FF00,0,01,41,1|o,00FF00,0,02,30,1|o,FF0000,0,03,43,1|o,00FF00,0,04,34,1|o,FF0000,0,05,43,1|o,FF0000,0,06,43,1|o,00FF00,0,07,32,1|o,00FF00,0,08,43,1|o,00FF00,0,09,32,1|o,00FF00,0,11,38,1|o,FF0000,0,12,42,1|o,00FF00,0,13,29,1|o,FF0000,0,14,43,1|o,FF0000,0,15,37,1|o,00FF00,0,16,34,1|o,00FF00,0,17,37,1|o,00FF00,0,18,41,1|x,0000FF,1,-1,8,1|x,00FFFF,4,-1,8,1|d,FFFF00,5,-1,20,1|t3,0000FF,1,01,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,02,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,03,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,04,15,1|t9,0000FF,1,05,15,1|t11,0000FF,1,06,15,1|t12,0000FF,1,07,15,1|t7,0000FF,1,08,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,09,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,10,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,11,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,12,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,13,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,14,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,15,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,16,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,17,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,18,15,1|t8,00FFFF,4,01,15,1|t25,00FFFF,4,02,15,1|t11,00FFFF,4,03,15,1|t26,00FFFF,4,04,15,1|t25,00FFFF,4,05,15,1|t27,00FFFF,4,06,15,1|t26,00FFFF,4,07,15,1|t17,00FFFF,4,08,15,1|t25,00FFFF,4,09,15,1|t21,00FFFF,4,10,15,1|t10,00FFFF,4,11,15,1|h,000000,0,0.64,1,1

Atlanta is ranked #6 by the computer with a 13-3 record and a rating of 85.846 against a schedule strength of 80.025.  Their performance chart can be found below and shows they were much more consistent with just 2 poor showings in 2 of their 3 losses, their worst game being @Philadelphia and best game being @St Louis.  They are 11-5 against the spread this year and the computer is 10-6 picking their games against the spread and 13-3 picking winners in their games.

chart?chs=800x375&cht=lc&chco=000000,0000FF,00FF00,FF0000,00FFFF,FFFF00&chxt=x,y&chls=0|1|0|0|1|0&chdl=Current|Weekly|Win|Loss|Schedule|Opponent&chdlp=t&chds=50,110&chtt=6 Atlanta 85.846&chd=t:-1,83.513,88.758,89.199,77.032,91.875,72.393,83.948,-1,86.031,90.206,92.033,89.150,89.631,87.710,90.701,75.599,86.110,-1|83.945,82.481,85.246,88.153,85.133,85.859,83.551,83.065,83.244,84.203,84.568,85.378,85.693,86.046,86.292,86.320,85.849,85.818,85.846|-1|-1|82.522,86.556,82.323,84.778,79.065,79.606,81.289,80.009,80.193,80.539,80.490,80.264,80.707,81.002,80.763,80.281,80.735,79.990,80.025|-1,87.520,72.579,82.394,77.021,80.089,82.992,78.957,-1,82.037,87.222,77.029,88.161,82.037,71.916,76.132,82.394,71.916,-1&chxl=0:||@PIT|ARI|@NWO|SFO|@CLE|@PHI|CIN|bye|TAM|BAL|@STL|GRB|@TAM|@CAR|@SEA|NWO|CAR|bye|1:|50|60|70|80|90|100|110&chm=o,FF0000,0,01,38,1|o,00FF00,0,02,27,1|o,00FF00,0,03,43,1|o,00FF00,0,04,31,1|o,00FF00,0,05,40,1|o,FF0000,0,06,43,1|o,00FF00,0,07,33,1|o,00FF00,0,09,36,1|o,00FF00,0,10,41,1|o,00FF00,0,11,37,1|o,00FF00,0,12,42,1|o,00FF00,0,13,42,1|o,00FF00,0,14,32,1|o,00FF00,0,15,36,1|o,FF0000,0,16,43,1|o,00FF00,0,17,26,1|x,0000FF,1,-1,8,1|x,00FFFF,4,-1,8,1|d,FFFF00,5,-1,20,1|t14,0000FF,1,01,15,1|t8,0000FF,1,02,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,03,15,1|t7,0000FF,1,04,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,05,15,1|t7,0000FF,1,06,15,1|t9,0000FF,1,07,15,1|t10,0000FF,1,08,15,1|t9,0000FF,1,09,15,1|t8,0000FF,1,10,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,11,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,12,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,13,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,14,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,15,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,16,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,17,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,18,15,1|t6,00FFFF,4,01,15,1|t10,00FFFF,4,02,15,1|t3,00FFFF,4,03,15,1|t23,00FFFF,4,04,15,1|t23,00FFFF,4,05,15,1|t14,00FFFF,4,06,15,1|t23,00FFFF,4,07,15,1|t22,00FFFF,4,08,15,1|t21,00FFFF,4,09,15,1|t19,00FFFF,4,10,15,1|t20,00FFFF,4,11,15,1|h,000000,0,0.60,1,1

The teams played head to head are separated by 2 degrees through Philly and San Francisco as follows:

1 Green_Bay-->Atlanta
2 Green_Bay-->Philadelphia-->Atlanta
2 Green_Bay-->San_Francisco-->Atlanta

Head to head Atlanta won by 3 at home, Green Bay beat Philly on the road twice while Atlanta lost on the road, and Atlanta best the 49ers by 2 at home while Green Bay beat them by 18.

The spread is Atlanta by 2 and the computer agrees but just by 0.7.  Here is the pick using the format from the newsletter:

 .Green Bay             +2.0 over *x              Atlanta  0.7  1.3 0.526 0.550

This game is interesting because Green Bay has been so up and down.  Green Bay has 8 single game ratings in the 90s, 4 of those over 96, while Atlanta has only 4 in the 90s and none over 92.033.  So at their best, Green Bay is the better team.  But Green Bay can be bad too with 3 games in the 70s and 5 below 83, while Atlanta also has 3 in the 70s but no other below 83.

Enjoy!

Baltimore at Pittsburgh Preview

Baltimore plays at Pittsburgh on 1/15 in a playoff game.

Baltimore is ranked #4 by the computer with a 13-4 record and a rating of 87.222 against a schedule strength of 81.723.  Their performance chart can be found below and shows they were fairly consistent and finished fairly strong, their worst game being @Cincinnati and best game being @Kansas City.  They are 8-7-1 against the spread this year and the computer is 6-9-1 picking their games against the spread and 12-4 picking winners in their games.

chart?chs=800x375&cht=lc&chco=000000,0000FF,00FF00,FF0000,00FFFF,FFFF00&chxt=x,y&chls=0|1|0|0|1|0&chdl=Current|Weekly|Win|Loss|Schedule|Opponent&chdlp=t&chds=50,110&chtt=4 Baltimore 87.222&chd=t:-1,91.560,75.948,85.075,94.313,84.781,89.918,79.539,-1,93.384,82.843,87.968,87.031,80.713,88.349,86.399,91.875,82.948,96.057|84.688,86.113,85.160,85.173,88.803,89.526,88.501,86.236,84.927,86.050,86.280,85.812,86.153,85.342,85.827,85.776,86.595,86.452,87.222|-1|-1|81.179,86.962,86.311,83.780,87.623,85.031,85.289,82.590,81.613,81.222,82.824,81.482,81.466,81.508,81.703,81.482,81.894,81.614,81.723|-1,86.572,78.957,80.089,87.520,74.175,90.928,78.553,-1,81.590,85.846,71.916,82.037,87.520,79.141,82.394,80.089,78.957,80.010&chxl=0:||@NYJ|@CIN|CLE|@PIT|DEN|@NWE|BUF|bye|MIA|@ATL|@CAR|TAM|PIT|@HOU|NWO|@CLE|CIN|@KAN|1:|50|60|70|80|90|100|110&chm=o,00FF00,0,01,43,1|o,FF0000,0,02,43,1|o,00FF00,0,03,33,1|o,00FF00,0,04,43,1|o,00FF00,0,05,27,1|o,FF0000,0,06,36,1|o,00FF00,0,07,31,1|o,00FF00,0,09,34,1|o,FF0000,0,10,41,1|o,00FF00,0,11,31,1|o,00FF00,0,12,35,1|o,FF0000,0,13,43,1|o,00FF00,0,14,38,1|o,00FF00,0,15,35,1|o,00FF00,0,16,39,1|o,00FF00,0,17,32,1|o,00FF00,0,18,39,1|x,0000FF,1,-1,8,1|x,00FFFF,4,-1,8,1|d,FFFF00,5,-1,20,1|t4,0000FF,1,01,15,1|t9,0000FF,1,02,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,03,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,04,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,05,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,06,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,07,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,08,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,09,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,10,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,11,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,12,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,13,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,14,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,15,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,16,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,17,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,18,15,1|t4,00FFFF,4,01,15,1|t2,00FFFF,4,02,15,1|t6,00FFFF,4,03,15,1|t1,00FFFF,4,04,15,1|t2,00FFFF,4,05,15,1|t1,00FFFF,4,06,15,1|t5,00FFFF,4,07,15,1|t10,00FFFF,4,08,15,1|t15,00FFFF,4,09,15,1|t5,00FFFF,4,10,15,1|t14,00FFFF,4,11,15,1|h,000000,0,0.62,1,1

Pittsburgh is ranked #3 by the computer with a 12-4 record and a rating of 87.520 against a schedule strength of 82.001.  Their performance chart can be found below and shows they were a little more up and down their downs standing out a bit more, their worst game being @New Orleans and best game being @Tampa Bay.  They are 10-6 against the spread this year and the computer is 10-6 picking their games against the spread and 10-6 picking winners in their games.

chart?chs=800x375&cht=lc&chco=000000,0000FF,00FF00,FF0000,00FFFF,FFFF00&chxt=x,y&chls=0|1|0|0|1|0&chdl=Current|Weekly|Win|Loss|Schedule|Opponent&chdlp=t&chds=50,110&chtt=3 Pittsburgh 87.520&chd=t:-1,89.843,90.204,98.117,80.406,-1,93.075,86.584,74.799,88.148,77.518,96.144,85.339,94.006,90.748,78.160,87.110,96.361,-1|82.092,83.556,87.172,91.746,90.123,91.011,90.076,89.322,86.185,87.167,85.435,85.962,86.001,86.615,87.076,86.221,86.598,87.407,87.520|-1|-1|79.949,79.481,83.419,85.233,84.106,85.649,82.158,82.574,82.371,83.073,83.148,82.104,82.151,82.645,82.275,82.340,81.746,81.895,82.001|-1,85.846,79.608,82.037,87.222,-1,80.089,81.590,82.394,78.957,90.928,80.028,78.553,87.222,78.957,86.572,71.916,80.089,-1&chxl=0:||ATL|@TEN|@TAM|BAL|bye|CLE|@MIA|@NWO|@CIN|NWE|OAK|@BUF|@BAL|CIN|NYJ|CAR|@CLE|bye|1:|50|60|70|80|90|100|110&chm=o,00FF00,0,01,38,1|o,00FF00,0,02,38,1|o,00FF00,0,03,41,1|o,FF0000,0,04,43,1|o,00FF00,0,06,33,1|o,00FF00,0,07,40,1|o,FF0000,0,08,43,1|o,00FF00,0,09,37,1|o,FF0000,0,10,43,1|o,00FF00,0,11,33,1|o,00FF00,0,12,37,1|o,00FF00,0,13,43,1|o,00FF00,0,14,31,1|o,FF0000,0,15,43,1|o,00FF00,0,16,24,1|o,00FF00,0,17,39,1|x,0000FF,1,-1,8,1|x,00FFFF,4,-1,8,1|d,FFFF00,5,-1,20,1|t9,0000FF,1,01,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,02,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,03,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,04,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,05,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,06,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,07,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,08,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,09,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,10,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,11,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,12,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,13,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,14,15,1|t4,0000FF,1,15,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,16,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,17,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,18,15,1|t22,00FFFF,4,01,15,1|t6,00FFFF,4,02,15,1|t2,00FFFF,4,03,15,1|t4,00FFFF,4,04,15,1|t1,00FFFF,4,05,15,1|t8,00FFFF,4,06,15,1|t6,00FFFF,4,07,15,1|t5,00FFFF,4,08,15,1|t2,00FFFF,4,09,15,1|t2,00FFFF,4,10,15,1|t7,00FFFF,4,11,15,1|h,000000,0,0.63,1,1

The teams played head to head twice are separated by 2 degrees as follows:

1 Baltimore-->Pittsburgh
1 Baltimore-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Atlanta-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Buffalo-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Carolina-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cincinnati-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cincinnati-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cincinnati-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cincinnati-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cleveland-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cleveland-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cleveland-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Cleveland-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Miami-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->New_England-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->New_Orleans-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->NY_Jets-->Pittsburgh
2 Baltimore-->Tampa_Bay-->Pittsburgh

The teams split their 2 games, the road team winning by a field goal each time.

The spread is Pittsburgh by 3 and the computer agrees nearly exactly picking them by 3.3.  Here is the pick using the format from the newsletter:

*xPittsburgh            -3.0 over  .            Baltimore  3.3  0.3 0.629 0.512

Enjoy!

Monday, January 10, 2011

BCS National Championship Preview

This preview was sent to subscribers, posting it here now for all.

Oregon is ranked #1 by the computer with a 12-0 record and a rating of 92.291 against a schedule strength of 70.341.  Their performance chart can be found below and shows they were pretty consistent all year other than their high and low, their worst game being @California and best game being against Stanford.  They are 7-4 against the spread this year and the computer is 6-5 picking their games against the spread and 10-1 picking winners in their games.

chart?chs=800x375&cht=lc&chco=000000,0000FF,00FF00,FF0000,00FFFF,FFFF00&chxt=x,y&chls=0|1|0|0|1|0&chdl=Current|Weekly|Win|Loss|Schedule|Opponent&chdlp=t&chds=30,110&chtt=1 Oregon 92.291&chd=t:-1,85.807,91.382,85.509,92.180,104.971,83.855,-1,91.713,95.251,94.583,79.531,-1,90.885,92.396,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1|80.294,80.496,86.058,88.600,85.616,96.089,93.153,94.576,91.615,93.332,93.670,90.628,91.224,91.245,91.334,91.354,91.552,91.478,91.660,92.291|-1|-1|72.403,50.214,62.024,57.658,58.432,65.934,65.376,64.927,64.135,65.628,66.924,68.083,68.559,68.971,69.591,69.621,69.864,69.818,69.974,70.341|-1,48.235,69.026,-1,78.170,89.246,64.771,-1,68.356,76.844,73.690,74.520,-1,75.691,75.383,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1&chxl=0:||NewMex|@Tenn|PortlandSt|@ASU|Stanford|@WSU|bye|UCLA|@USC|Wash|@Cal|bye|Ariz|@OrSt|bye|bye|bye|bye|bye|1:|30|50|70|90|110&chm=o,00FF00,0,01,4,1|o,00FF00,0,02,23,1|o,00FF00,0,03,4,1|o,00FF00,0,04,32,1|o,00FF00,0,05,37,1|o,00FF00,0,06,18,1|o,00FF00,0,08,16,1|o,00FF00,0,09,31,1|o,00FF00,0,10,21,1|o,00FF00,0,11,28,1|o,00FF00,0,13,23,1|o,00FF00,0,14,29,1|x,0000FF,1,-1,8,1|x,00FFFF,4,-1,8,1|d,FFFF00,5,-1,20,1|t8,0000FF,1,01,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,02,15,1|t2,0000FF,1,03,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,04,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,05,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,06,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,07,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,08,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,09,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,10,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,11,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,12,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,13,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,14,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,15,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,16,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,17,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,18,15,1|t1,0000FF,1,19,15,1|t88,00FFFF,4,01,15,1|t66,00FFFF,4,02,15,1|t102,00FFFF,4,03,15,1|t104,00FFFF,4,04,15,1|t50,00FFFF,4,05,15,1|t56,00FFFF,4,06,15,1|t69,00FFFF,4,07,15,1|t72,00FFFF,4,08,15,1|t50,00FFFF,4,09,15,1|t38,00FFFF,4,10,15,1|t23,00FFFF,4,11,15,1|t24,00FFFF,4,12,15,1|t16,00FFFF,4,13,15,1|t17,00FFFF,4,14,15,1|h,000000,0,0.78,1,1

Auburn is ranked #3 by the computer with a 13-0 record and a rating of 85.964 against a schedule strength of 70.564.  Their performance chart can be found below and shows they were pretty consistent too but finishing a bit stronger than Oregon did, their worst game being against Clemson and best game being against South Carolina.  They are 8-4 against the spread this year and the computer is 8-5 picking their games against the spread and 10-3 picking winners in their games.

chart?chs=800x375&cht=lc&chco=000000,0000FF,00FF00,FF0000,00FFFF,FFFF00&chxt=x,y&chls=0|1|0|0|1|0&chdl=Current|Weekly|Win|Loss|Schedule|Opponent&chdlp=t&chds=30,110&chtt=3 Auburn 85.964&chd=t:-1,78.933,81.599,71.833,83.612,81.202,73.166,97.885,84.541,82.738,80.766,87.584,-1,88.447,98.172,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1|76.644,75.683,77.193,76.358,79.050,76.587,78.594,81.601,81.063,80.473,80.896,82.193,82.811,83.187,85.560,85.455,85.589,85.599,85.926,85.964|-1|-1|72.407,53.366,63.761,67.094,69.656,62.767,66.521,68.101,67.955,67.665,66.656,67.178,67.609,68.902,70.028,69.905,70.156,70.156,70.428,70.564|-1,59.991,75.588,71.822,78.602,55.753,67.156,81.794,80.530,64.164,-1,72.963,-1,84.436,78.602,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1&chxl=0:||ArkSt|@MissSt|Clemson|SoCar|LaMon|@Kntky|Ark|LSU|@Miss|Chatt|Georgia|bye|@Ala|SoCar|bye|bye|bye|bye|bye|1:|30|50|70|90|110&chm=o,00FF00,0,01,14,1|o,00FF00,0,02,36,1|o,00FF00,0,03,26,1|o,00FF00,0,04,33,1|o,00FF00,0,05,10,1|o,00FF00,0,06,27,1|o,00FF00,0,07,36,1|o,00FF00,0,08,35,1|o,00FF00,0,09,24,1|o,00FF00,0,10,12,1|o,00FF00,0,11,27,1|o,00FF00,0,13,43,1|o,00FF00,0,14,36,1|x,0000FF,1,-1,8,1|x,00FFFF,4,-1,8,1|d,FFFF00,5,-1,20,1|t26,0000FF,1,01,15,1|t21,0000FF,1,02,15,1|t20,0000FF,1,03,15,1|t17,0000FF,1,04,15,1|t23,0000FF,1,05,15,1|t23,0000FF,1,06,15,1|t10,0000FF,1,07,15,1|t13,0000FF,1,08,15,1|t10,0000FF,1,09,15,1|t6,0000FF,1,10,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,11,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,12,15,1|t5,0000FF,1,13,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,14,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,15,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,16,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,17,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,18,15,1|t3,0000FF,1,19,15,1|t79,00FFFF,4,01,15,1|t56,00FFFF,4,02,15,1|t35,00FFFF,4,03,15,1|t24,00FFFF,4,04,15,1|t81,00FFFF,4,05,15,1|t44,00FFFF,4,06,15,1|t36,00FFFF,4,07,15,1|t29,00FFFF,4,08,15,1|t28,00FFFF,4,09,15,1|t39,00FFFF,4,10,15,1|t29,00FFFF,4,11,15,1|t38,00FFFF,4,12,15,1|t21,00FFFF,4,13,15,1|t13,00FFFF,4,14,15,1|h,000000,0,0.70,1,1

The teams are not separated by 2 degrees but are through 3 as follows:

3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->Alabama-->Auburn
3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->Georgia-->Auburn
3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->Kentucky-->Auburn
3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->LSU-->Auburn
3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->Mississippi-->Auburn
3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->South_Carolina-->Auburn
3 Oregon-->Tennessee-->South_Carolina-->Auburn

The spread opened Auburn by 3 but has shrunk to 1 to 1.5 and the computer disagrees in either case picking the upset having Oregon by an astounding 5.9.  Here is the pick using the format from the newsletter:

 *Oregon                +3.0 over ..               Auburn  5.9  8.9 0.736 0.829

Why does the computer like Oregon so much more given they played near identical schedule strengths?  Simply put, Oregon played a similar schedule but handle them much more decisively than Auburn did, other than the Cal game of course.  And given the Cal game and how the teams finished though, even though the computer does give a little more weight to games at the end of the season, it is useful to look at just those games.

Using Oregon's last 5 games, their rating would be 90.5, the last 4 89.3, and the last 3 87.6.  This compared with the season long rating of 92.291.

Using Auburn's last 5 games, their rating would be 87.5, the last 4 88.7, and the last 3 91.4.  This compared with the season long rating of 85.961.

So Auburn was on the rise, and Cal on a bit of a downswing, to the point that Auburn could be argued to be playing better and have a higher rating if just the last 3 games are used.  However, these ratings are skewed by Oregon's worst game being in that set and Auburn's best game being so.  If you consider both of those completely valid and an indication of how the teams were playing, then the computer's pick perhaps isn't correct.

However, if you throw the best and worst out from each teams last 5 you get Oregon rated at 92.6 and Auburn at 86.3.  So you decide, were those highs/lows anomalies or an accurate indicator?

Enjoy!