First, the weather. The event was again in Mobile, and again there was rain. So much that by the end they were playing no-ad and short sets to 4 rather than 6. Note that 40 & Over is back at Mobile against this weekend and the forecast is for a 50% chance of scattered thunderstorms Saturday thru Monday, so there could be format changes again. Let's hope the rain isn't too bad and a Sectionals Champ isn't decided with a short format.
Second, this Sectionals used the flightless random round-robin format for some events, it appears where there were fewer than 10 teams and so they couldn't have two five team flights. Thankfully, unlike NorCal's use of the format where they had as many as 21 teams in the round-robin and each team play only 3 matches, Southern had each team play 4 round-robin matches and with only 7-9 teams in the round-robin, there were no undefeated teams left out from advancing to the semis.
That isn't to say things were always clear-cut. There were some ties for the advancing spots:
- The 2.5 women had seven teams in the round-robin and three teams tied at 2-2 for 3rd-5th, but the 3rd and 4th teams had better court records.
- The 4.0 women had nine teams in the round-robin and a 4-way tie for 4th at 2-2, but one team had a better court record and advance, but still very close. One super tie-break goes the other way in a number of matches and the result is a lot different.
- The 4.5 women had eight teams but no tie for the last advancing spot.
- The 3.0 men had eight teams and a 3-way tie for 4th, the advancing team having the better court record.
- The 5.0+ men had seven teams and a 2-way tie for 4th, the advancing team having the better court record.
So the format seemed to work well, and thankfully things were decided on court records and didn't get to the bad tie-breakers.
Third, we need to check if any Sectional Champs were early start league teams with bumped up players that won't be eligible at Nationals.
- The 3.0 men had a Georgia and Alabama team in the final, both from ESLs with players that are now 3.5s, and Georgia won. They have just one 3.5 though so the team will largely be the same at Nationals.
- The 4.5 women had an ESL Georgia team in the final, but they did not have any year-end 5.0s and lost to Kentucky in the final anyway.
- The 4.0 women had an ESL Tennessee team in the final with one year-end 4.5, but Louisiana won the final.
- The 3.0 women had an ESL Georgia team with 7(!) now 3.5s playing a Tennessee ESL team with 3 now 3.5s. Georgia predictably won and now goes to Nationals with a radically different roster than they won Sectionals with. The seven ineligible players played in 66% of the player slots in round-robin.
- The 2.5 women had an ESL Tennessee team with 6 of 10 eligible players now 3.0s win and advance to Nationals. Note that these 3.0s may be eligible for Nationals as the 2.5 level is granted an exception and players must be "clearly above level" to not be eligible for Nationals.
So one team will definitely be affected, and two others may have minor impacts to their Nationals eligible rosters.
Were you at the event? How did it go or what are your thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment