Monday, February 22, 2010
NBA and College Basketball Rankings through 2/21/2010
The NBA and College basketball ratings and rankings have been updated on the web-site through games played Sunday the 21st.
Labels:
basketball,
college,
nba,
rankings,
ratings
Monday, February 15, 2010
Projected 65 team college basketball tournament teams
The College basketball ratings and rankings have been updated on the web-site through games played Sunday the 14th.
And rather than just post the rankings here, instead, the list below are the current teams that would make the 65 team tourney using the highest ranked team from the 31 conferences and the next 34 highest rated teams to fill out the bracket. Those teams with an asterisk are the highest rated from their conference and thus the projected automatic bid.
And rather than just post the rankings here, instead, the list below are the current teams that would make the 65 team tourney using the highest ranked team from the 31 conferences and the next 34 highest rated teams to fill out the bracket. Those teams with an asterisk are the highest rated from their conference and thus the projected automatic bid.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | Kansas* | 95.931 | 24-1 | 80.158 | +0, +0.590 |
2 | Duke* | 94.445 | 21-4 | 81.311 | +1, +0.562 |
3 | Syracuse* | 92.932 | 24-2 | 79.593 | -1, -2.061 |
4 | Villanova | 92.674 | 22-2 | 81.183 | +2, +0.701 |
5 | Kansas St | 92.254 | 19-4 | 81.665 | +0, +0.010 |
6 | Purdue* | 91.815 | 21-3 | 80.066 | +3, +0.725 |
7 | West Virginia | 91.677 | 19-5 | 82.987 | -3, -0.933 |
8 | Kentucky* | 91.220 | 24-1 | 78.458 | +0, -0.243 |
9 | Wisconsin | 90.591 | 19-6 | 81.269 | -2, -0.959 |
10 | Ohio State | 90.390 | 20-6 | 79.141 | +6, +0.924 |
11 | Baylor | 90.292 | 18-5 | 79.880 | -1, -0.435 |
12 | Brigham Young* | 90.136 | 22-3 | 77.564 | +1, -0.185 |
13 | Texas | 90.093 | 20-5 | 79.684 | -2, -0.298 |
14 | Georgetown DC | 89.982 | 18-6 | 82.220 | -2, -0.355 |
15 | Marquette | 89.601 | 16-8 | 79.541 | -1, -0.070 |
16 | Missouri | 89.425 | 18-7 | 78.441 | -1, -0.068 |
17 | Gonzaga* | 89.282 | 20-4 | 79.566 | +2, +0.722 |
18 | California* | 88.667 | 17-8 | 81.593 | +2, +0.231 |
19 | Maryland | 88.446 | 15-7 | 79.684 | -2, -0.710 |
20 | Xavier OH* | 88.325 | 17-7 | 81.190 | +11, +0.855 |
21 | Dayton | 87.961 | 17-7 | 79.456 | +6, +0.282 |
21 | Michigan St | 87.961 | 20-6 | 80.675 | -3, -0.764 |
23 | New Mexico | 87.812 | 23-3 | 79.143 | +10, +0.477 |
24 | Butler* | 87.806 | 23-4 | 79.669 | +2, +0.126 |
25 | Pittsburgh | 87.774 | 19-6 | 80.522 | +3, +0.134 |
26 | Louisville | 87.754 | 16-9 | 81.017 | -5, -0.389 |
27 | Vanderbilt | 87.624 | 18-5 | 80.500 | +5, +0.235 |
28 | Utah St* | 87.600 | 19-6 | 78.090 | +1, +0.059 |
29 | Texas A&M | 87.568 | 17-6 | 80.880 | +1, +0.033 |
30 | Wake Forest | 87.447 | 18-5 | 80.998 | +4, +0.176 |
31 | Temple | 87.350 | 20-5 | 80.246 | +7, +0.896 |
32 | Clemson | 87.071 | 18-7 | 79.815 | +4, +0.112 |
33 | Georgia Tech | 87.007 | 16-8 | 80.771 | -9, -0.847 |
34 | Virginia Tech | 86.958 | 20-4 | 77.091 | +14, +1.036 |
35 | Mississippi | 86.657 | 17-7 | 79.596 | +0, -0.507 |
36 | St Mary's CA | 86.617 | 20-5 | 78.039 | -13, -1.344 |
37 | Old Dominion* | 86.471 | 20-7 | 78.742 | +7, +0.418 |
38 | UTEP* | 86.437 | 19-5 | 75.866 | +2, +0.232 |
39 | Tennessee | 86.409 | 18-6 | 80.105 | -14, -1.305 |
40 | UNLV | 86.350 | 18-6 | 80.056 | -18, -1.628 |
41 | Mississippi St | 86.096 | 18-7 | 77.793 | +6, +0.142 |
42 | Richmond | 85.967 | 20-6 | 79.074 | +19, +0.912 |
42 | Washington | 85.967 | 17-8 | 79.966 | +7, +0.092 |
44 | Oklahoma St | 85.963 | 17-7 | 78.753 | +9, +0.368 |
45 | San Diego St | 85.946 | 16-7 | 79.631 | +9, +0.358 |
46 | Northern Iowa* | 85.753 | 22-3 | 77.804 | -9, -0.783 |
47 | Florida St | 85.558 | 18-7 | 79.827 | +4, -0.141 |
48 | Arizona St | 85.507 | 18-8 | 78.618 | +4, -0.182 |
57 | Siena* | 84.890 | 22-5 | 76.733 | -12, -1.114 |
59 | Murray St* | 84.709 | 22-3 | 72.453 | +7, +0.529 |
68 | Cornell NY* | 83.645 | 19-4 | 76.179 | -25, -2.451 |
84 | Kent St* | 82.514 | 17-8 | 78.003 | -6, -0.464 |
90 | Wofford* | 81.664 | 18-8 | 76.071 | +5, +0.117 |
91 | Montana* | 81.569 | 16-8 | 75.902 | -3, -0.707 |
98 | Sam Houston St* | 81.228 | 14-5 | 75.901 | +6, +0.235 |
117 | IUPUI* | 79.643 | 16-9 | 76.133 | +4, +0.274 |
125 | Coastal Carolina* | 78.948 | 18-5 | 71.473 | -11, -0.855 |
139 | Belmont* | 78.526 | 16-10 | 75.616 | +3, +0.242 |
141 | Morgan St* | 78.506 | 19-7 | 73.824 | -17, -0.747 |
147 | Western Kentucky* | 78.067 | 15-12 | 75.647 | +10, +0.521 |
151 | Long Beach St* | 77.797 | 10-13 | 79.964 | +5, +0.162 |
161 | Stony Brook* | 77.305 | 17-7 | 71.832 | +21, +1.001 |
181 | Quinnipiac* | 76.071 | 18-7 | 69.348 | -1, -0.317 |
199 | Lehigh* | 75.141 | 16-9 | 71.702 | -13, -0.667 |
244 | Texas Southern* | 71.764 | 10-11 | 72.578 | +5, +0.129 |
Labels:
basketball,
college,
rankings,
ratings,
tournament
Monday, February 8, 2010
NBA and College Basketball Rankings through 2/7/2010
The NBA and College basketball ratings and rankings have been updated on the web-site through games played Sunday the 7th.
In the NBA, the top-3 are the same, but Utah swaps spots with the Lakers.
The college top-25 is listed below and show the top-3 staying the same but WVU and Wisconsin making the big leaps up to #4 and #7 respectively.
In the NBA, the top-3 are the same, but Utah swaps spots with the Lakers.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | Cleveland | 90.414 | 41-11 | 83.521 | +0, +0.169 |
2 | Utah | 88.472 | 31-18 | 83.598 | +1, +0.538 |
3 | LA Lakers | 88.296 | 39-13 | 83.346 | -1, -0.313 |
4 | Orlando | 87.437 | 34-17 | 83.673 | +1, +0.001 |
5 | Denver | 87.223 | 34-17 | 83.541 | -1, -0.411 |
6 | Oklahoma City | 86.862 | 29-21 | 83.902 | +1, +0.445 |
7 | Atlanta | 86.424 | 32-17 | 83.614 | -1, -0.124 |
8 | San Antonio | 86.191 | 29-20 | 82.893 | +1, +0.265 |
9 | Phoenix | 85.764 | 31-21 | 84.043 | +6, +1.121 |
10 | Boston | 85.678 | 32-17 | 83.494 | -2, -0.321 |
11 | Portland | 85.070 | 30-23 | 83.826 | +0, -0.222 |
12 | Charlotte | 85.058 | 24-25 | 84.031 | -2, -0.794 |
13 | Dallas | 84.357 | 31-19 | 84.135 | -1, -0.760 |
14 | Milwaukee | 84.214 | 23-26 | 83.862 | +6, +0.785 |
15 | Houston | 84.186 | 27-23 | 84.249 | +4, +0.378 |
16 | Toronto | 84.101 | 28-23 | 83.732 | +0, -0.538 |
17 | Miami | 83.884 | 24-27 | 84.242 | -3, -0.789 |
18 | Memphis | 83.879 | 26-24 | 84.005 | -5, -0.929 |
19 | Chicago | 83.768 | 24-25 | 84.121 | -2, -0.702 |
20 | New Orleans | 83.437 | 27-24 | 83.575 | -2, -0.663 |
21 | Philadelphia | 82.426 | 19-31 | 83.421 | +1, +1.099 |
22 | LA Clippers | 81.633 | 21-29 | 84.048 | -1, +0.200 |
23 | New York | 81.075 | 19-31 | 83.090 | +0, +0.291 |
24 | Indiana | 80.533 | 18-33 | 83.444 | +3, +0.846 |
25 | Washington | 79.885 | 17-32 | 83.505 | +1, -0.174 |
26 | Sacramento | 79.786 | 16-34 | 84.316 | -1, -0.312 |
27 | Golden State | 79.611 | 13-36 | 84.156 | -3, -0.574 |
28 | Minnesota | 79.509 | 13-38 | 83.862 | +1, +1.112 |
29 | Detroit | 78.427 | 17-32 | 83.605 | -1, -0.410 |
30 | New Jersey | 74.842 | 4-46 | 84.197 | +0, +0.181 |
The college top-25 is listed below and show the top-3 staying the same but WVU and Wisconsin making the big leaps up to #4 and #7 respectively.
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
1 | Kansas | 95.341 | 22-1 | 79.714 | +0, -0.919 |
2 | Syracuse | 94.993 | 23-1 | 79.554 | +0, +0.697 |
3 | Duke | 93.883 | 19-4 | 81.081 | +0, -0.061 |
4 | West Virginia | 92.610 | 19-3 | 82.086 | +7, +1.486 |
5 | Kansas St | 92.244 | 18-4 | 81.926 | +0, +0.274 |
6 | Villanova | 91.973 | 20-2 | 80.641 | -2, -1.273 |
7 | Wisconsin | 91.550 | 18-5 | 81.539 | +6, +1.320 |
8 | Kentucky | 91.463 | 22-1 | 78.560 | -1, +0.213 |
9 | Purdue | 91.090 | 19-3 | 80.112 | +1, -0.096 |
10 | Baylor | 90.727 | 16-5 | 79.236 | -1, -0.463 |
11 | Texas | 90.391 | 19-4 | 79.524 | +1, -0.510 |
12 | Georgetown DC | 90.337 | 17-5 | 81.900 | -4, -0.871 |
13 | Brigham Young | 90.321 | 21-3 | 78.098 | -7, -1.044 |
14 | Marquette | 89.671 | 15-8 | 79.708 | +0, -0.538 |
15 | Missouri | 89.493 | 17-6 | 77.979 | +2, -0.146 |
16 | Ohio State | 89.466 | 18-6 | 78.730 | +0, -0.249 |
17 | Maryland | 89.156 | 15-6 | 78.909 | +4, +0.863 |
18 | Michigan St | 88.725 | 19-5 | 80.402 | -3, -1.084 |
19 | Gonzaga | 88.560 | 18-4 | 79.987 | +16, +1.638 |
20 | California | 88.436 | 15-8 | 82.062 | +3, +0.174 |
21 | Louisville | 88.143 | 15-8 | 80.153 | +5, +0.460 |
22 | UNLV | 87.978 | 18-4 | 79.668 | +18, +1.514 |
23 | St Mary's CA | 87.961 | 20-3 | 77.191 | -2, -0.332 |
24 | Georgia Tech | 87.854 | 16-6 | 80.247 | -6, -1.145 |
25 | Tennessee | 87.714 | 18-4 | 79.271 | +4, +0.261 |
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Congratulations New Orleans
And then there were the Saints. The team that was #1 every week of the year since week 2 and the team that the computer picked to win the Super Bowl despite Vegas having the Colts by 6 won the Super Bowl to bring the first championship to New Orleans.
As can be seen in the final ratings/rankings, the win extends the Saints lead to over 2 ratings points over new #2 Minnesota. Interestingly, the Colts fall all the way to #4 as the computer has to use the 31-17 final score even though that isn't indicative of how close the game was. Had the game finished at 24-17 the Colts would have stayed #2 narrowly ahead of Minnesota.
For the post season, the computer did well going 6-4-1 against the spread and 8-3 picking winners. Coupled with the 148-102-6 against the spread and 166-90 picking winners in the regular season, all in all a good year in the picking department.
As can be seen in the final ratings/rankings, the win extends the Saints lead to over 2 ratings points over new #2 Minnesota. Interestingly, the Colts fall all the way to #4 as the computer has to use the 31-17 final score even though that isn't indicative of how close the game was. Had the game finished at 24-17 the Colts would have stayed #2 narrowly ahead of Minnesota.
For the post season, the computer did well going 6-4-1 against the spread and 8-3 picking winners. Coupled with the 148-102-6 against the spread and 166-90 picking winners in the regular season, all in all a good year in the picking department.
Super Bowl XLIV Preview
Here is the full Super Bowl XLIV preview that was sent to newsletter subscribers awhile ago and is now on the web-site. Previews for all of the 2010 NFL playoffs here.
The Saints and Colts will meet in the Super Bowl on February 7 in Miami.
The Saints are ranked #1 by the computer with a 15-3 record and a rating of 87.906 against a schedule strength of 80.664. Their performance chart can be found below and shows that apart from the 3 game stretch where they were perhaps not playing to win they were pretty consistent and were the clear #1 all year. However, the Arizona game rated up where they'd been all year but the game against Minnesota didn't as much. They are 9-8-1 against the spread this year and the computer is 9-8-1 picking their games against the spread and 14-4 picking winners in their games.

The Colts are ranked #2 with a 16-2 record and a rating of 86.548 against a schedule strength of 80.619. Their performance chart can be found below and shows they too, except for the dip when they rested players, were consistently very good and ranked #2 much of the year. They are 11-5-2 against the spread and the computer is 9-7-2 predicting them against the spread and 14-4 picking the winner in their games.

The teams did not play head to head but are separated by 2 degrees in 6 ways as follows:
2 New_Orleans-->Arizona-->Indianapolis
The Saints and Colts will meet in the Super Bowl on February 7 in Miami.
The Saints are ranked #1 by the computer with a 15-3 record and a rating of 87.906 against a schedule strength of 80.664. Their performance chart can be found below and shows that apart from the 3 game stretch where they were perhaps not playing to win they were pretty consistent and were the clear #1 all year. However, the Arizona game rated up where they'd been all year but the game against Minnesota didn't as much. They are 9-8-1 against the spread this year and the computer is 9-8-1 picking their games against the spread and 14-4 picking winners in their games.
The Colts are ranked #2 with a 16-2 record and a rating of 86.548 against a schedule strength of 80.619. Their performance chart can be found below and shows they too, except for the dip when they rested players, were consistently very good and ranked #2 much of the year. They are 11-5-2 against the spread and the computer is 9-7-2 predicting them against the spread and 14-4 picking the winner in their games.
The teams did not play head to head but are separated by 2 degrees in 6 ways as follows:
2 New_Orleans-->Arizona-->
2 New_Orleans-->Buffalo-->Indianapolis
2 New_Orleans-->Miami-->Indianapolis
2 New_Orleans-->New_England-->Indianapolis
2 New_Orleans-->NY_Jets-->Indianapolis
2 New_Orleans-->St_Louis-->Indianapolis
Against Arizona, Indy won early in the year 31-10 on the road (when the Cardinals were playing better on the road than at home) and the Saints won 45-14 just last week at home. The Saints beat Buffalo 27-7 on the road early and the Colts lost 30-7 on the road when mailing it in week 17. Against Miami Indy won 27-23 early on the road and New Orleans won 46-34 also on the road mid-season. The Colts eked out the 35-34 win at home over the Patriots while the Saints won 38-17 at home. Indy played the Jets twice losing 29-15 when mailing it in but winning 30-17 when it mattered while the Saints won 24-10 early. And the Colts beat the Rams 42-6 on the road mid-season and the Saints won narrowly 28-23 a few weeks later.
From the results alone, edge would seem to be the Saints just because they won every one of the common opponents games and the Colts lost 2. But those 2 were when the Colts rested players and the Saints bad games just weren't against common opponents. Apart from those 2 losses, the common opponents is pretty close with NO an edge with Miami and the Pats and Indy the edge with the Rams.
2 New_Orleans-->Miami-->
2 New_Orleans-->New_England-->
2 New_Orleans-->NY_Jets-->
2 New_Orleans-->St_Louis-->
Against Arizona, Indy won early in the year 31-10 on the road (when the Cardinals were playing better on the road than at home) and the Saints won 45-14 just last week at home. The Saints beat Buffalo 27-7 on the road early and the Colts lost 30-7 on the road when mailing it in week 17. Against Miami Indy won 27-23 early on the road and New Orleans won 46-34 also on the road mid-season. The Colts eked out the 35-34 win at home over the Patriots while the Saints won 38-17 at home. Indy played the Jets twice losing 29-15 when mailing it in but winning 30-17 when it mattered while the Saints won 24-10 early. And the Colts beat the Rams 42-6 on the road mid-season and the Saints won narrowly 28-23 a few weeks later.
From the results alone, edge would seem to be the Saints just because they won every one of the common opponents games and the Colts lost 2. But those 2 were when the Colts rested players and the Saints bad games just weren't against common opponents. Apart from those 2 losses, the common opponents is pretty close with NO an edge with Miami and the Pats and Indy the edge with the Rams.
The early spread is all over the place, all picking the Colts, but ranging from 2.5 to 6 points.
With the computer picking the Saints by 1.4 the pick on the surface would be to get grab the +6 right away. Here
is
the pick
using the format from the newsletter:
*New_Orleans +6.0 over .. Indianapolis 1.4 7.4 0.541 0.712
However, if we dig a bit, we can look at a few scenarios. First, we clearly know that the Colts rested players the last 2 weeks. What effect would winning those 2 games of had on their rating? Let's make both games 20-17 wins for the Colts. That would have put the Colts #1 and the pick by 1.7. Had they won each game 27-17 instead, the pick would be Colts by 2.5 which reaches the lower end of the current spread range.
But, perhaps the Saints were resting too. Let's assume the Dallas game was valid but then they rested the last 2 weeks and would have won 20-17 in each game. Coupled with the larger Colts wins scenario above, this would shrink the pick to Colts by 0.5.
So, even with the scenarios, the strongest pick would continue to be Saints plus the 6, although some scenarios clearly have the Colts the pick to win rather than the Saints. Use the information as you will, and let me know if you have any questions or other scenarios you'd like run.
Enjoy!
However, if we dig a bit, we can look at a few scenarios. First, we clearly know that the Colts rested players the last 2 weeks. What effect would winning those 2 games of had on their rating? Let's make both games 20-17 wins for the Colts. That would have put the Colts #1 and the pick by 1.7. Had they won each game 27-17 instead, the pick would be Colts by 2.5 which reaches the lower end of the current spread range.
But, perhaps the Saints were resting too. Let's assume the Dallas game was valid but then they rested the last 2 weeks and would have won 20-17 in each game. Coupled with the larger Colts wins scenario above, this would shrink the pick to Colts by 0.5.
So, even with the scenarios, the strongest pick would continue to be Saints plus the 6, although some scenarios clearly have the Colts the pick to win rather than the Saints. Use the information as you will, and let me know if you have any questions or other scenarios you'd like run.
Enjoy!
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
NBA and College Basketball Rankings through 1/31/2010
The NBA and College basketball ratings and rankings have been updated on the web-site through games played Sunday the 31st.
In the NBA, the top-3 remain the same with Cleveland, the Lakers, and Utah, and only Denver moving past Orlando is the only change in the top-7. All these teams are close though so a loss or big win here and there can cause movement.
In College, Kansas remains #1 and Syracuse moves to #2. Duke goes 1-1 during the week and drops to #3, Villanova stays at #4, and KState moves up 2 spots to #5 dropping BYU who had a loss to #6.
In the NBA, the top-3 remain the same with Cleveland, the Lakers, and Utah, and only Denver moving past Orlando is the only change in the top-7. All these teams are close though so a loss or big win here and there can cause movement.
In College, Kansas remains #1 and Syracuse moves to #2. Duke goes 1-1 during the week and drops to #3, Villanova stays at #4, and KState moves up 2 spots to #5 dropping BYU who had a loss to #6.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)