Through 2012, USTA League had an 18 & over division and then a "Senior" division that was for those 50 & over. In 2013, this changed to add a 40 & over division and change the existing Senior division to 55 & over.
I occasionally hear discussion about participation in the 40 & over league, if it is really needed/different from the 18 & over, and if it was just a way for the USTA to charge members to play in another league and make more money. So looking at some stats is in order.
I've written about league participation before, but the quick summary is that in 2016 there were about 200K participants in 18 & over and 125K in 40 & over. That likely means a lot of 40+ folks play in 18+, but 18+ is certainly still serving a large group of folks.
18 & over participation:
40 & over participation:
One can't dispute the claim that the USTA is making more money by giving those over 40 two divisions to play in. But those players do get to play more right?
Some believe or have observed that when the split happened, the seasons for the leagues became a bit shorter, necessary in order to fit two separate seasons into the calendar. So, I went about looking at the number of team matches played in 2012 and then successive years after the split.
In the chart above, we see that teams on average played just over 9 regular season matches per season, and since then both the 18+ and 40+ leagues have dropped to just under 9 for the 18+ and closer to 8 for 40+.
Based on this, the data does support the observation that on average, teams do have a few fewer matches. For 18+, about one of every three teams played one match less than before the split, and 40+ has just played fewer from the start.
So it is correct that adding the 40+ league has not doubled the playing opportunity for those over 40, but it is pretty close as the matches per team has dropped only slightly.
Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts
Sunday, March 12, 2017
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Superbowl Preview - 49ers vs Ravens
Here is a preview of the Superbowl using my computer's ratings.
San Francisco is rated #1 by my computer so they are the pick to win the game on a neutral field. But let's look deeper.
First, here is the 49ers performance chart.

This shows that in the majority of their games, they have been quite consistent, right around the low 90s with a few games a bit higher and a few a bit lower. Their losses and tie appear as aberrations but the fact they happened means one could happen again. To be fair though, the 2 losses in the last 9 games were both on the road and they just had a great road result in their last game.
If there is a "good" and "bad" 49er team, in their wins they averaged 93.1 rating points while in their losses they averaged 73.7. And if you look at just their last 4 wins they average a slightly higher 93.7.
Here is Baltimore's chart.

They haven't had quite as clear a disparity between good and bad, with some fairly consistent results in their wins in the mid to upper 80s through much of the season, then some poor results in losses, but then have been very strong in the playoffs. And you might throw out the Bengals game as meaningless so they've really had 4 strong results in a row recently.
If we look at just Baltimore's last 4 wins, they average 95.7.
So, looking at the entirety of the season, my computer would pick the 49ers by 3. With Vegas having the line originally at 5 and closer to 3.5 or 4 now, that would make the pick the Ravens to cover.
And if you assume the teams are both going to show up with their best games, one could make the argument that the Ravens best is actually a bit better than the 49ers, around 2 points, so that would seem to reinforce the pick of the Ravens plus the points and even give hope to those that are picking the upset.
Here is hoping for an exciting and competitive game.
San Francisco is rated #1 by my computer so they are the pick to win the game on a neutral field. But let's look deeper.
First, here is the 49ers performance chart.
This shows that in the majority of their games, they have been quite consistent, right around the low 90s with a few games a bit higher and a few a bit lower. Their losses and tie appear as aberrations but the fact they happened means one could happen again. To be fair though, the 2 losses in the last 9 games were both on the road and they just had a great road result in their last game.
If there is a "good" and "bad" 49er team, in their wins they averaged 93.1 rating points while in their losses they averaged 73.7. And if you look at just their last 4 wins they average a slightly higher 93.7.
Here is Baltimore's chart.
They haven't had quite as clear a disparity between good and bad, with some fairly consistent results in their wins in the mid to upper 80s through much of the season, then some poor results in losses, but then have been very strong in the playoffs. And you might throw out the Bengals game as meaningless so they've really had 4 strong results in a row recently.
If we look at just Baltimore's last 4 wins, they average 95.7.
So, looking at the entirety of the season, my computer would pick the 49ers by 3. With Vegas having the line originally at 5 and closer to 3.5 or 4 now, that would make the pick the Ravens to cover.
And if you assume the teams are both going to show up with their best games, one could make the argument that the Ravens best is actually a bit better than the 49ers, around 2 points, so that would seem to reinforce the pick of the Ravens plus the points and even give hope to those that are picking the upset.
Here is hoping for an exciting and competitive game.
Week 20 NFL Ratings and Rankings - San Francisco moves to #1
The ratings after week 20 are now posted and listed below as well.
San Francisco moves to #2 while New England drops to #3 after the conference championship games. Baltimore moves up two spots to #6 but still trails.
This means the computer likes the 49ers in the Superbowl, more to come.
San Francisco moves to #2 while New England drops to #3 after the conference championship games. Baltimore moves up two spots to #6 but still trails.
This means the computer likes the 49ers in the Superbowl, more to come.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | San Francisco | 87.869 | 13-4-1 | 82.266 | +2, +0.110 |
| 2 | Seattle | 87.785 | 12-6 | 82.296 | +0, -0.178 |
| 3 | New England | 87.340 | 13-5 | 80.332 | -2, -1.549 |
| 4 | Denver | 87.327 | 13-4 | 79.384 | +0, +0.170 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 85.607 | 12-6 | 81.545 | +0, -0.079 |
| 6 | Baltimore | 84.894 | 13-6 | 80.901 | +3, +1.277 |
| 7 | Atlanta | 84.705 | 14-4 | 80.013 | -1, -0.341 |
| 8 | Chicago | 83.815 | 10-6 | 81.106 | -1, -0.107 |
| 9 | NY Giants | 83.794 | 9-7 | 81.142 | -1, +0.170 |
| 10 | Houston | 83.332 | 13-5 | 80.187 | +0, -0.211 |
| 11 | Minnesota | 83.150 | 10-7 | 81.699 | +0, -0.103 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.671 | 10-7 | 80.964 | +0, +0.133 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.484 | 10-7 | 79.498 | +0, +0.250 |
| 14 | Carolina | 81.421 | 7-9 | 80.815 | +1, +0.012 |
| 15 | St Louis | 81.415 | 7-8-1 | 82.622 | -1, -0.225 |
| 16 | Pittsburgh | 80.614 | 8-8 | 79.427 | +1, +0.287 |
| 17 | New Orleans | 80.492 | 7-9 | 81.048 | -1, +0.025 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay | 80.174 | 7-9 | 80.531 | +0, -0.009 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.171 | 8-8 | 81.478 | +0, +0.125 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.428 | 7-9 | 80.196 | +0, -0.336 |
| 21 | San Diego | 78.982 | 7-9 | 79.124 | +1, +0.127 |
| 22 | Indianapolis | 78.841 | 11-6 | 79.134 | -1, -0.126 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.355 | 5-11 | 82.739 | +0, -0.211 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.394 | 6-10 | 79.905 | +0, -0.289 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.353 | 4-12 | 81.727 | +0, -0.142 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.000 | 6-10 | 80.737 | +0, -0.272 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.525 | 5-11 | 80.182 | +0, +0.246 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.328 | 6-10 | 79.808 | +0, -0.199 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.901 | 4-12 | 81.268 | +0, +0.126 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.302 | 4-12 | 79.712 | +0, +0.132 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 70.952 | 2-14 | 80.117 | +0, -0.207 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.545 | 2-14 | 80.423 | +0, +0.106 |
Monday, January 14, 2013
NFL Conference Championship Performance Charts
As a quick way to visually see how the final 4 teams have performed, here are their performance charts.

New England is #1 for a reason, they've had a lot of good results. I've had a few folks say they think even so, they are underrated, and what is holding them back are a few bad results. The Arizona and early season Baltimore loss don't count that much now, but the 49ers loss and narrow win over Jacksonville are holding them back a bit now. If you don't include those considering them aberrations their last 5 games have all been in the 90-100 range, very strong.

Baltimore had a tough patch late in the year, but were banged up a bit and perhaps the Cincinnati game didn't mean much to them. Ignoring that game, 3 of their last 4 have been in the 90-97 range, also quite strong.

Atlanta won a lot, but played a weaker schedule. In fact, they've only had a few results over 90 late in the year, their best again the Giants. They certainly don't look as strong as the AFC teams unless they can repeat their peak form.

The 49ers have also been a bit up and down, but like the AFC teams their highs have been in the 90-100 range and they've had a bunch. They look a bit stronger in general than Atlanta and are ranked higher, but they have to go on the road.
New England is #1 for a reason, they've had a lot of good results. I've had a few folks say they think even so, they are underrated, and what is holding them back are a few bad results. The Arizona and early season Baltimore loss don't count that much now, but the 49ers loss and narrow win over Jacksonville are holding them back a bit now. If you don't include those considering them aberrations their last 5 games have all been in the 90-100 range, very strong.
Baltimore had a tough patch late in the year, but were banged up a bit and perhaps the Cincinnati game didn't mean much to them. Ignoring that game, 3 of their last 4 have been in the 90-97 range, also quite strong.
Atlanta won a lot, but played a weaker schedule. In fact, they've only had a few results over 90 late in the year, their best again the Giants. They certainly don't look as strong as the AFC teams unless they can repeat their peak form.
The 49ers have also been a bit up and down, but like the AFC teams their highs have been in the 90-100 range and they've had a bunch. They look a bit stronger in general than Atlanta and are ranked higher, but they have to go on the road.
NFL Week 19 Ratings and Rankings - New England stretches their lead
The ratings after week 19 are now posted and listed below as well.
New England stays #1 and Seattle stays #2, but the gap widens. The 49ers and Broncos swap spots right behind them.
Seattle loses a few ratings points but stays #2 because they were predicted to have a narrow (less than 1 point, computer almost called it perfect) win and lost by 2, so they were rated pretty close to correct. For the same reason, Atlanta's rating improves slightly but they stay #6 even though Green Bay at #5 did lose ratings points, just not enough.
Baltimore does move up 2 spots after their road win but will still be an underdog to the Patriots. Atlanta and San Francisco will be a very close prediction.
New England stays #1 and Seattle stays #2, but the gap widens. The 49ers and Broncos swap spots right behind them.
Seattle loses a few ratings points but stays #2 because they were predicted to have a narrow (less than 1 point, computer almost called it perfect) win and lost by 2, so they were rated pretty close to correct. For the same reason, Atlanta's rating improves slightly but they stay #6 even though Green Bay at #5 did lose ratings points, just not enough.
Baltimore does move up 2 spots after their road win but will still be an underdog to the Patriots. Atlanta and San Francisco will be a very close prediction.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | New England | 88.889 | 13-4 | 80.346 | +0, +0.333 |
| 2 | Seattle | 87.963 | 12-6 | 82.496 | +0, -0.172 |
| 3 | San Francisco | 87.759 | 12-4-1 | 82.181 | +1, +0.578 |
| 4 | Denver | 87.157 | 13-4 | 79.267 | -1, -0.929 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 85.686 | 12-6 | 81.643 | +0, -0.692 |
| 6 | Atlanta | 85.046 | 14-3 | 79.691 | +0, +0.163 |
| 7 | Chicago | 83.922 | 10-6 | 81.215 | +0, -0.131 |
| 8 | NY Giants | 83.624 | 9-7 | 80.983 | +1, +0.051 |
| 9 | Baltimore | 83.617 | 12-6 | 80.324 | +2, +0.698 |
| 10 | Houston | 83.543 | 13-5 | 80.398 | -2, -0.349 |
| 11 | Minnesota | 83.253 | 10-7 | 81.808 | -1, -0.191 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.538 | 10-7 | 80.842 | +0, +0.035 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.234 | 10-7 | 79.266 | +0, +0.018 |
| 14 | St Louis | 81.640 | 7-8-1 | 82.829 | +0, -0.002 |
| 15 | Carolina | 81.409 | 7-9 | 80.805 | +0, -0.087 |
| 16 | New Orleans | 80.467 | 7-9 | 81.020 | +0, -0.039 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 80.327 | 8-8 | 79.166 | +0, +0.056 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay | 80.183 | 7-9 | 80.521 | +0, -0.058 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.046 | 8-8 | 81.332 | +0, +0.031 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.764 | 7-9 | 80.513 | +0, +0.037 |
| 21 | Indianapolis | 78.967 | 11-6 | 79.280 | +0, -0.053 |
| 22 | San Diego | 78.855 | 7-9 | 78.993 | +0, -0.060 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.566 | 5-11 | 82.969 | +0, +0.017 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.683 | 6-10 | 80.231 | +0, +0.022 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.495 | 4-12 | 81.854 | +0, -0.119 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.272 | 6-10 | 81.061 | +0, +0.023 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.279 | 5-11 | 79.913 | +0, +0.020 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.527 | 6-10 | 80.030 | +0, -0.105 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.775 | 4-12 | 81.127 | +0, +0.044 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.170 | 4-12 | 79.587 | +0, -0.071 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 71.159 | 2-14 | 80.340 | +0, -0.076 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.439 | 2-14 | 80.286 | +0, -0.078 |
Monday, January 7, 2013
College Football Week 20 and Final Ratings and Rankings - Alabama #1
This week's and the season's final ratings and rankings are now posted.
Alabama moves to #1 after swapping it back and forth with Oregon during the bowl season with their dominating win over Notre Dame. They aren't that far ahead of Oregon, less than 0.7 ratings points, but they finish #1 never the less.
The SEC is well represented after that with Texas A&M, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina in spots 3 thru 6 and LSU at #9. The Pac-12 is represented with 2 teams with Stanford at #10 joining Oregon.
The top-25 is below, full ratings on the site.
Alabama moves to #1 after swapping it back and forth with Oregon during the bowl season with their dominating win over Notre Dame. They aren't that far ahead of Oregon, less than 0.7 ratings points, but they finish #1 never the less.
The SEC is well represented after that with Texas A&M, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina in spots 3 thru 6 and LSU at #9. The Pac-12 is represented with 2 teams with Stanford at #10 joining Oregon.
The top-25 is below, full ratings on the site.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | Alabama | 93.564 | 13-1 | 73.779 | +1, +2.262 |
| 2 | Oregon | 92.886 | 12-1 | 72.047 | -1, -0.111 |
| 3 | Texas A&M | 89.930 | 11-2 | 74.817 | +0, +0.574 |
| 4 | Georgia | 88.235 | 12-2 | 74.265 | +0, +0.684 |
| 5 | Florida | 86.630 | 11-2 | 76.239 | +1, +0.327 |
| 6 | South Carolina | 86.298 | 11-2 | 74.580 | +1, +0.399 |
| 7 | Kansas St | 85.669 | 11-2 | 74.441 | +1, -0.075 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | 85.252 | 12-1 | 74.985 | -3, -1.508 |
| 9 | LSU | 84.879 | 10-3 | 74.538 | +0, +0.700 |
| 10 | Stanford | 83.733 | 12-2 | 75.418 | +0, -0.237 |
| 11 | Ohio State | 83.413 | 12-0 | 69.739 | +0, +0.049 |
| 12 | Florida St | 82.778 | 12-2 | 66.569 | +0, -0.045 |
| 13 | Utah St | 82.708 | 11-2 | 65.806 | +0, -0.099 |
| 14 | Oklahoma | 82.607 | 10-3 | 74.066 | +0, -0.128 |
| 15 | Oregon St | 81.932 | 9-4 | 74.181 | +0, -0.112 |
| 16 | Clemson | 81.757 | 11-2 | 69.976 | +1, +0.110 |
| 17 | Oklahoma St | 81.710 | 8-5 | 71.373 | -1, -0.043 |
| 18 | Baylor | 80.463 | 8-5 | 75.068 | +0, -0.163 |
| 19 | Wisconsin | 80.048 | 8-6 | 73.061 | +0, +0.016 |
| 20 | Michigan | 79.695 | 8-5 | 73.560 | +0, +0.142 |
| 21 | Texas | 79.595 | 9-4 | 74.879 | +0, +0.049 |
| 22 | Vanderbilt | 79.305 | 9-4 | 70.711 | +2, +0.479 |
| 23 | Brigham Young | 79.256 | 8-5 | 69.171 | -1, -0.194 |
| 24 | Mississippi | 78.981 | 7-6 | 75.080 | +6, +1.775 |
| 25 | Southern Cal | 78.903 | 7-6 | 74.665 | -2, -0.270 |
Sunday, January 6, 2013
NFL Week 18 Ratings and Rankings - Patriots remain #1
The ratings after week 18 are now posted and listed below as well.
New England stays #1 but Seattle moves up to #2 just ahead of Denver. All three teams are very close and the 49ers are close behind before a bit of a drop to Green Bay and the rest.
New England stays #1 but Seattle moves up to #2 just ahead of Denver. All three teams are very close and the 49ers are close behind before a bit of a drop to Green Bay and the rest.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | New England | 88.556 | 12-4 | 80.348 | +0, +0.033 |
| 2 | Seattle | 88.135 | 12-5 | 82.143 | +1, +0.485 |
| 3 | Denver | 88.086 | 13-3 | 79.162 | -1, +0.005 |
| 4 | San Francisco | 87.181 | 11-4-1 | 82.213 | +0, +0.082 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 86.378 | 12-5 | 81.178 | +0, +0.482 |
| 6 | Atlanta | 84.883 | 13-3 | 79.452 | +0, -0.075 |
| 7 | Chicago | 84.053 | 10-6 | 81.354 | +0, -0.007 |
| 8 | Houston | 83.892 | 13-4 | 79.805 | +1, +0.098 |
| 9 | NY Giants | 83.573 | 9-7 | 80.928 | +1, -0.029 |
| 10 | Minnesota | 83.444 | 10-7 | 81.970 | -2, -0.502 |
| 11 | Baltimore | 82.919 | 11-6 | 79.797 | +1, +0.400 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.503 | 10-7 | 80.803 | -1, -0.518 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.216 | 10-7 | 79.255 | +0, -0.166 |
| 14 | St Louis | 81.642 | 7-8-1 | 82.822 | +0, +0.028 |
| 15 | Carolina | 81.496 | 7-9 | 80.877 | +0, -0.053 |
| 16 | New Orleans | 80.506 | 7-9 | 81.086 | +0, -0.054 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 80.271 | 8-8 | 79.141 | +1, -0.040 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay | 80.241 | 7-9 | 80.590 | -1, -0.097 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.015 | 8-8 | 81.287 | +0, -0.085 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.727 | 7-9 | 80.480 | +0, -0.004 |
| 21 | Indianapolis | 79.020 | 11-6 | 79.347 | +0, -0.505 |
| 22 | San Diego | 78.915 | 7-9 | 79.085 | +0, -0.023 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.549 | 5-11 | 82.951 | +0, +0.058 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.661 | 6-10 | 80.195 | +0, +0.000 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.614 | 4-12 | 81.978 | +0, -0.021 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.249 | 6-10 | 81.022 | +0, -0.020 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.259 | 5-11 | 79.880 | +0, -0.068 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.632 | 6-10 | 80.135 | +0, -0.068 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.731 | 4-12 | 81.071 | +0, -0.095 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.241 | 4-12 | 79.674 | +0, -0.026 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 71.235 | 2-14 | 80.452 | +0, -0.092 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.517 | 2-14 | 80.372 | +0, -0.065 |
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
2013 Sugar Bowl Preview - Florida vs Louisville
On the surface, the Sugar Bowl matchup between Florida and Louisville may look like a slam dunk for the team from the SEC. Let's take a look at the bowl preview to see if this is indeed the case.
were quite good all year, particularly mid-season, but did finish a bit down in 4 of their last 5 until they beat FSU. They did have one of the tougher schedules all year long.
Louisville is ranked #57 by the computer with a 10-2 record and a rating of 72.736 against a schedule strength of 66.413. Yes, you read that right, Louisville's schedule is nearly 10 points lower than Florida's, a key reason they can be 10-2 and only ranked #57. Their performance chart from week 15 can be found below and shows they were pretty consistent, just always around the low to mid 70s, and they did lose 2 of their last 3 games with results in the 50s.
The teams are separated by 2 degrees through Kentucky whom Louisville beat 32-14 at home and Florida beat 38-0 at home.
The spread has hovered around 13-14 and my computer in a rare occurrence with a line this big says it isn't enough picking Florida by 17.1.
Enjoy!
2013 Fiesta Bowl Preview - Oregon vs Kansas State
In a game that could have been the BCS Championship game except for one fateful Saturday, Oregon and K-State face off in the Fiesta Bowl this Thursday night.
Oregon is ranked #2 by my computer with an 11-1 record and a rating of 91.369 against a schedule strength of 70.861. Their performance chart through week 14 can be found below and shows they were highly ranked almost all year, but had a very weak scheduled until late in the season and that is when they had their one loss.

Kansas State is ranked #6 by the computer with a 11-1 record and a rating of 87.704 against a schedule strength of 73.604. Their performance chart from week 15 can be found below and shows
they were also highly ranked all year and had a stronger schedule than Oregon, but had a worse loss than Oregon did.

The teams are not separated by 2 degrees at all, and by 3 degrees through Arizona/Oklahoma State and Arkansas State/North Texas.
The spread is Oregon by 8 to 8.5 and the computer agrees but has Oregon by only 3.7 after their rating has dropped with some of the bowl results. So Kansas plus the points is the pick.
Oregon is ranked #2 by my computer with an 11-1 record and a rating of 91.369 against a schedule strength of 70.861. Their performance chart through week 14 can be found below and shows they were highly ranked almost all year, but had a very weak scheduled until late in the season and that is when they had their one loss.
Kansas State is ranked #6 by the computer with a 11-1 record and a rating of 87.704 against a schedule strength of 73.604. Their performance chart from week 15 can be found below and shows
they were also highly ranked all year and had a stronger schedule than Oregon, but had a worse loss than Oregon did.
The teams are not separated by 2 degrees at all, and by 3 degrees through Arizona/Oklahoma State and Arkansas State/North Texas.
The spread is Oregon by 8 to 8.5 and the computer agrees but has Oregon by only 3.7 after their rating has dropped with some of the bowl results. So Kansas plus the points is the pick.
College Football Week 18+ Ratings and Rankings - Alabama moves to #1
My computer's ratings and rankings through the Orange Bowl (week 18+) are below and week 18 is on the web-site.
After staying #1 through all the bowl games played through Saturday, Oregon finally succumbed and has fallen behind Alabama for the top spot. Why is this do you ask if neither team has played? It is because of how their opponents have done in bowl games. And more specifically, how Oregon's opponents have done.
Alabama's rating has moved just a fraction from 91.056 after the SEC title game to 91.421, the biggest benefit coming from Georgia winning by more than expected over Nebraska. But Oregon has seen their rating drop over 2 points from 93.723 to 91.369. This is due to prior opponents doing poorly in bowl games including Fresno State (43-10 loss), Arizona (closer than expected win), Washington (close loss), USC (ugly loss), and Oregon State (loss when expected to win).
Other movers include FSU and Clemson making a statement for the ACC.
The top-25 is below including games played through the Orange Bowl, full ratings through last Saturday on the site.
After staying #1 through all the bowl games played through Saturday, Oregon finally succumbed and has fallen behind Alabama for the top spot. Why is this do you ask if neither team has played? It is because of how their opponents have done in bowl games. And more specifically, how Oregon's opponents have done.
Alabama's rating has moved just a fraction from 91.056 after the SEC title game to 91.421, the biggest benefit coming from Georgia winning by more than expected over Nebraska. But Oregon has seen their rating drop over 2 points from 93.723 to 91.369. This is due to prior opponents doing poorly in bowl games including Fresno State (43-10 loss), Arizona (closer than expected win), Washington (close loss), USC (ugly loss), and Oregon State (loss when expected to win).
Other movers include FSU and Clemson making a statement for the ACC.
The top-25 is below including games played through the Orange Bowl, full ratings through last Saturday on the site.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | Alabama | 91.421 | 12-1 | 72.458 | +1, -0.032 |
| 2 | Oregon | 91.369 | 11-1 | 70.861 | -1, -0.818 |
| 3 | Florida | 89.798 | 11-1 | 76.179 | +0, +0.582 |
| 4 | Texas A&M | 88.297 | 10-2 | 74.149 | +0, -0.135 |
| 5 | Georgia | 88.251 | 12-2 | 74.188 | +2, +1.002 |
| 6 | Kansas St | 87.704 | 11-1 | 73.604 | -1, -0.363 |
| 7 | Notre Dame | 87.091 | 12-0 | 73.812 | -1, -0.394 |
| 8 | South Carolina | 86.666 | 11-2 | 74.735 | +0, +0.310 |
| 9 | Oklahoma | 84.853 | 10-2 | 73.650 | +0, -0.472 |
| 10 | LSU | 84.552 | 10-3 | 74.276 | +0, -0.751 |
| 11 | Stanford | 83.769 | 12-2 | 75.493 | +0, -0.393 |
| 12 | Ohio State | 83.474 | 12-0 | 69.788 | +0, -0.164 |
| 13 | Florida St | 83.333 | 12-2 | 66.880 | +5, +2.171 |
| 14 | Utah St | 82.801 | 11-2 | 65.909 | -1, -0.068 |
| 15 | Oklahoma St | 82.631 | 8-5 | 72.171 | -1, +0.081 |
| 16 | Oregon St | 81.906 | 9-4 | 74.198 | -1, -0.547 |
| 17 | Clemson | 81.872 | 11-2 | 70.036 | +4, +1.658 |
| 18 | Baylor | 81.461 | 8-5 | 76.038 | -2, -0.400 |
| 19 | Texas | 80.429 | 9-4 | 75.578 | +0, -0.451 |
| 20 | Wisconsin | 80.098 | 8-6 | 73.067 | +0, -0.505 |
| 21 | Michigan | 79.764 | 8-5 | 73.620 | +1, +0.131 |
| 22 | Brigham Young | 79.451 | 8-5 | 69.405 | +2, +0.214 |
| 23 | Vanderbilt | 79.444 | 9-4 | 70.808 | +3, +0.565 |
| 24 | Southern Cal | 78.988 | 7-6 | 74.704 | -7, -2.600 |
| 25 | Northwestern | 78.683 | 10-3 | 70.276 | +7, +1.200 |
Monday, December 31, 2012
How did the Bears and Giants rank in the top-10 but not make the playoffs?
We all know that a record doesn't tell you everything about a team, and looking at my week 17 ratings and rankings and comparing to who made the playoffs, this is evident on several levels.
First, Indianapolis is ranked #21 but is one of the 12 teams making the playoffs. This is due to 2 things, a very weak schedule based in part on having the worst record last year, and winning a lot of close games. Their performance chart is telling. You can see how their wins are mostly just above their rating while several of their losses are well below their rating.

But what about the teams that were "left out"?
Chicago is ranked #7 by my computer but lost the wildcard tie-breaker to Minnesota on division record. To be fair, my computer has Minnesota #8 just over 0.1 points behind, and Chicago is not ahead of any other non-division winner in the NFC. Their chart shows a clear decline in the second half of their year where they went 5-8, although all those losses were to playoff teams. Their rating is fairly high because of this tough schedule (#7) with only 3 playoff teams having a tougher schedule.

The Giants are ranked #10 by my computer but were a game out of the tie-breaker with Chicago and Minnesota. Had they won one more game, they would have had the conference record advantage over both of them and been in the playoffs. But losing 3 of their last 5 hurt them, although they too were to playoff teams. And losing early in the year to 3 teams that didn't make the playoffs didn't help.
First, Indianapolis is ranked #21 but is one of the 12 teams making the playoffs. This is due to 2 things, a very weak schedule based in part on having the worst record last year, and winning a lot of close games. Their performance chart is telling. You can see how their wins are mostly just above their rating while several of their losses are well below their rating.
But what about the teams that were "left out"?
Chicago is ranked #7 by my computer but lost the wildcard tie-breaker to Minnesota on division record. To be fair, my computer has Minnesota #8 just over 0.1 points behind, and Chicago is not ahead of any other non-division winner in the NFC. Their chart shows a clear decline in the second half of their year where they went 5-8, although all those losses were to playoff teams. Their rating is fairly high because of this tough schedule (#7) with only 3 playoff teams having a tougher schedule.
The Giants are ranked #10 by my computer but were a game out of the tie-breaker with Chicago and Minnesota. Had they won one more game, they would have had the conference record advantage over both of them and been in the playoffs. But losing 3 of their last 5 hurt them, although they too were to playoff teams. And losing early in the year to 3 teams that didn't make the playoffs didn't help.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Early 2012/13 NFL Playoffs Superbowl Odds
We now know who will be in the playoffs and who will play who. With that, it is time to run through the scenarios of how the playoffs could play out, and what that means to the chances of each team making it to and winning the Superbowl.
| Team | Conference | Superbowl |
|---|---|---|
| Denver | 0.378 | 0.205 |
| New England | 0.323 | 0.174 |
| San Francisco | 0.292 | 0.148 |
| Atlanta | 0.292 | 0.138 |
| Seattle | 0.128 | 0.066 |
| Green Bay | 0.130 | 0.064 |
| Houston | 0.102 | 0.048 |
| Baltimore | 0.091 | 0.041 |
| Minnesota | 0.077 | 0.035 |
| Washington | 0.080 | 0.035 |
| Cincinnati | 0.060 | 0.027 |
| Indianapolis | 0.046 | 0.019 |
While Denver is not the highest rated team by my computer, they do have home field advantage through the playoffs and thus have the edge over the Patriots to get to the Superbowl as well as win it. The Patriots are the 2nd pick though and not that far behind.
In the NFC, the 49ers and Falcons are nearly equals to both get to and win the Superbowl, the edge going to the 49ers because of Atlanta's slide the past few weeks of the season. The highest rated team in the NFC is Seattle and because they have to play an extra round as compared with the 1st four mentioned, and thus the slot in at the 5th pick.
The chances fall out after that somewhat as expected with the Colts have the worst chance at just under 5% of making it to the Superbowl and less than 2% of winning.
NFL Playoff Team Performance Charts
With the completion of the NFL regular season, it is interesting to take a look at the performance charts for the playoff teams to see how they are entering the post-season. Here they are with a few comments.

The Patriot's rating was remarkably consistent, even if they had a few up and down games.

Denver started the season a bit lower, and started 2-3, but then went on a streak and have been in the top-4 the last 8 weeks.

Seattle benefited from a win over Green Bay early, but finished the season very strong and moving up to #3.

The 49ers have had the lowest lows of any of the top-4 teams, but also some pretty high highs.

The Packers have been a bit up and down, but finished pretty strong until the loss to the Vikings who they get to play again.

Atlanta was strong early, but wasn't as good late, some questions entering the post-season.

Minnesota was the last team in, but finished strong in their last 4 to get there.

Houston is a bit like Atlanta, not finishing strong at all.

Washington had a worse start than Denver, 3-6, but have had a similar strong finish.

Baltimore has a similar profile to Houston and somewhat Atlanta, not finishing that strong.

Cincinnati also finished strong, just the lone loss to Dallas, to get into the playoffs.

The Colts had a very weak schedule and made the most of it, being #21 in the league but being amongst the 12 teams making the playoffs. A lot of close wins is what didn't impress the computer.
The Patriot's rating was remarkably consistent, even if they had a few up and down games.
Denver started the season a bit lower, and started 2-3, but then went on a streak and have been in the top-4 the last 8 weeks.
Seattle benefited from a win over Green Bay early, but finished the season very strong and moving up to #3.
The 49ers have had the lowest lows of any of the top-4 teams, but also some pretty high highs.
The Packers have been a bit up and down, but finished pretty strong until the loss to the Vikings who they get to play again.
Atlanta was strong early, but wasn't as good late, some questions entering the post-season.
Minnesota was the last team in, but finished strong in their last 4 to get there.
Houston is a bit like Atlanta, not finishing strong at all.
Washington had a worse start than Denver, 3-6, but have had a similar strong finish.
Baltimore has a similar profile to Houston and somewhat Atlanta, not finishing that strong.
Cincinnati also finished strong, just the lone loss to Dallas, to get into the playoffs.
The Colts had a very weak schedule and made the most of it, being #21 in the league but being amongst the 12 teams making the playoffs. A lot of close wins is what didn't impress the computer.
NFL Week 17 Ratings and Rankings - New England finished #1
The ratings after week 17 are now posted and listed below as well.
New England moves back ahead of Denver based primarily on Denver having to play the worst team in the league while the Patriots got to play now 7-9 Miami. They are only a half point apart so it really is very close.
Behind them, Seattle stays ahead of San Francisco, despite San Francisco beating them out for the NFC West. Atlanta falls more with their loss than Green Bay does leaving the Packers at #5 and the Falcons at #6.
It will be no solace to Chicago that they are #7 and ahead of Minnesota at #8 because they lost out on tie-breakers to them. Houston's losing streak dropped them all the way to #9.
The Giants are another team that missed the playoffs but is ranked ahead of teams that made it. The worst team in the playoffs? The Colts way down at #21.
We are now on to the playoffs. Look for more posts shortly.
New England moves back ahead of Denver based primarily on Denver having to play the worst team in the league while the Patriots got to play now 7-9 Miami. They are only a half point apart so it really is very close.
Behind them, Seattle stays ahead of San Francisco, despite San Francisco beating them out for the NFC West. Atlanta falls more with their loss than Green Bay does leaving the Packers at #5 and the Falcons at #6.
It will be no solace to Chicago that they are #7 and ahead of Minnesota at #8 because they lost out on tie-breakers to them. Houston's losing streak dropped them all the way to #9.
The Giants are another team that missed the playoffs but is ranked ahead of teams that made it. The worst team in the playoffs? The Colts way down at #21.
We are now on to the playoffs. Look for more posts shortly.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | New England | 88.523 | 12-4 | 80.320 | +1, +0.357 |
| 2 | Denver | 88.081 | 13-3 | 79.177 | -1, -0.169 |
| 3 | Seattle | 87.650 | 11-5 | 81.924 | +0, -0.056 |
| 4 | San Francisco | 87.099 | 11-4-1 | 82.150 | +0, +0.050 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 85.896 | 11-5 | 81.290 | +1, -0.274 |
| 6 | Atlanta | 84.958 | 13-3 | 79.527 | -1, -1.216 |
| 7 | Chicago | 84.060 | 10-6 | 81.363 | +1, -0.064 |
| 8 | Minnesota | 83.946 | 10-6 | 81.484 | +1, +0.269 |
| 9 | Houston | 83.794 | 12-4 | 79.902 | -2, -1.170 |
| 10 | NY Giants | 83.602 | 9-7 | 80.989 | +0, +0.179 |
| 11 | Washington | 83.021 | 10-6 | 80.597 | +1, +0.274 |
| 12 | Baltimore | 82.519 | 10-6 | 80.111 | -1, -0.376 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.382 | 10-6 | 78.799 | +0, +0.214 |
| 14 | St Louis | 81.614 | 7-8-1 | 82.785 | +0, +0.136 |
| 15 | Carolina | 81.549 | 7-9 | 80.928 | +1, +0.627 |
| 16 | New Orleans | 80.560 | 7-9 | 81.131 | -1, -0.667 |
| 17 | Tampa Bay | 80.338 | 7-9 | 80.695 | +3, +0.990 |
| 18 | Pittsburgh | 80.311 | 8-8 | 79.178 | +1, +0.382 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.100 | 8-8 | 81.347 | -2, -0.382 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.731 | 7-9 | 80.485 | -2, -0.357 |
| 21 | Indianapolis | 79.525 | 11-5 | 78.955 | +2, +1.010 |
| 22 | San Diego | 78.938 | 7-9 | 79.111 | -1, -0.333 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.491 | 5-11 | 82.889 | -1, -0.221 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.661 | 6-10 | 80.197 | +2, +0.931 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.635 | 4-12 | 81.987 | +0, -0.145 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.269 | 6-10 | 81.018 | -2, -0.952 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.327 | 5-11 | 79.939 | +0, -0.365 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.700 | 6-10 | 80.204 | +0, +0.503 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.826 | 4-12 | 81.157 | +0, -0.405 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.267 | 4-12 | 79.700 | +0, +0.301 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 71.327 | 2-14 | 80.526 | +0, -0.634 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.582 | 2-14 | 80.419 | +0, +0.208 |
Sunday, December 23, 2012
NFL Week 16 Ratings and Rankings - Denver the new #1
The ratings after week 16 are now posted and listed below as well.
Denver moves to #1 ahead of New England, and Seattle moves to #3 ahead of the 49ers.
Denver moves to #1 ahead of New England, and Seattle moves to #3 ahead of the 49ers.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | Denver | 88.250 | 12-3 | 80.022 | +2, +0.282 |
| 2 | New England | 88.166 | 11-4 | 80.648 | -1, -0.662 |
| 3 | Seattle | 87.706 | 10-5 | 82.157 | +2, +1.147 |
| 4 | San Francisco | 87.049 | 10-4-1 | 82.646 | -2, -1.201 |
| 5 | Atlanta | 86.174 | 13-2 | 79.659 | +1, +0.303 |
| 6 | Green Bay | 86.170 | 11-4 | 80.981 | +1, +0.384 |
| 7 | Houston | 84.964 | 12-3 | 79.729 | -3, -1.683 |
| 8 | Chicago | 84.124 | 9-6 | 81.431 | +1, +0.928 |
| 9 | Minnesota | 83.677 | 9-6 | 81.377 | +2, +1.624 |
| 10 | NY Giants | 83.423 | 8-7 | 81.751 | -2, -1.162 |
| 11 | Baltimore | 82.895 | 10-5 | 79.819 | +1, +0.951 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.747 | 9-6 | 80.887 | -2, +0.096 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.168 | 9-6 | 78.862 | +0, +0.378 |
| 14 | St Louis | 81.478 | 7-7-1 | 82.219 | +3, +0.933 |
| 15 | New Orleans | 81.227 | 7-8 | 81.329 | +0, +0.300 |
| 16 | Carolina | 80.922 | 6-9 | 80.856 | +0, +0.046 |
| 17 | Dallas | 80.482 | 8-7 | 81.083 | -3, -0.625 |
| 18 | Miami | 80.088 | 7-8 | 79.719 | +2, +0.214 |
| 19 | Pittsburgh | 79.929 | 7-8 | 79.665 | -1, -0.412 |
| 20 | Tampa Bay | 79.348 | 6-9 | 80.291 | -1, -0.900 |
| 21 | San Diego | 79.271 | 6-9 | 79.733 | +3, +1.013 |
| 22 | Arizona | 78.712 | 5-10 | 82.518 | +0, -0.615 |
| 23 | Indianapolis | 78.515 | 10-5 | 78.954 | +0, -0.055 |
| 24 | NY Jets | 78.221 | 6-9 | 81.001 | -3, -1.221 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.780 | 4-11 | 82.187 | +0, -0.213 |
| 26 | Buffalo | 76.730 | 5-10 | 80.692 | +0, -0.766 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.692 | 5-10 | 79.603 | +0, -0.118 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.197 | 5-10 | 81.072 | +0, -0.513 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 74.231 | 4-11 | 80.849 | +0, -0.304 |
| 30 | Oakland | 72.966 | 4-11 | 79.662 | +0, +0.110 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 71.961 | 2-13 | 80.616 | +0, +0.200 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.374 | 2-13 | 79.622 | +0, -0.003 |
NFC East Playoff Scenarios as of 12/13 2:40pm Pacific
After the early games today, we have a situation where 6 teams could be tied at 9-7 in the NFC, one winning the NFC East and the other 5 vying for the 2 wildcard spots.
First, let's take a look who would win the NFC East. In this scenario, Dallas beats Washington and the Giants go 1-1 in their last 2 games. Dallas would win the division on the common opponent tie-breaker over Washington with the Giants having fallen by the wayside on the division record tie-breaker.
That would leave Washington, the Giants, Minnesota, Chicago, and Seattle as the other teams. Seattle would have to go 0-2, Chicago 1-1, and Minnesota 1-1.
Washington would get the first wildcard, first by beating the Giants on division record, then beating the other 3 teams on conference record.
Then the wildcard tie-breakers are done again, this time with the Giants included again and now the Giants beat the other teams on conference record.
There are certainly many other scenarios, but this one was pretty interesting so thought I'd write it up. More perhaps later.
First, let's take a look who would win the NFC East. In this scenario, Dallas beats Washington and the Giants go 1-1 in their last 2 games. Dallas would win the division on the common opponent tie-breaker over Washington with the Giants having fallen by the wayside on the division record tie-breaker.
That would leave Washington, the Giants, Minnesota, Chicago, and Seattle as the other teams. Seattle would have to go 0-2, Chicago 1-1, and Minnesota 1-1.
Washington would get the first wildcard, first by beating the Giants on division record, then beating the other 3 teams on conference record.
Then the wildcard tie-breakers are done again, this time with the Giants included again and now the Giants beat the other teams on conference record.
There are certainly many other scenarios, but this one was pretty interesting so thought I'd write it up. More perhaps later.
Friday, December 21, 2012
What if the NFL used the BCS?
Thankfully the NFL doesn't and we have normal playoffs, but Alex at the Bleacher Report went through the effort the use one human poll, my computer ratings, and three other computers to come up with "BCS" standings for the NFL. Take a look here.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
NFL Week 15 Projected Records - Atlanta and Houston top the conferences
The projected records after week 15 are now posted and listed below as well.
The top 4 teams are all projected to win out, Denver convincingly, and if this happens, New England will be left out of the first round byes.
Baltimore is expected to win the AFC North, and Indianapolis and now Cincinnati instead of Pittsburgh the wildcards.
The NFC has gotten interesting with the NFC East up for grabs and now a race for the 2 wildcard spots. Washington is given the edge being projected to finish 10-6 ahead of the Giants and Cowboys both at 9-7. But those two teams still have a shot at the wildcard given Chicago's fall as they are also projected at 9-7 with Minnesota being there too. It could come down to which teams are at that record and thus which tie-breakers come into play, but the Giants then Vikings have the better conference record of the group.
I am also tracking the projected playoff teams by week so take a look at that to see how things change from week to week.
The top 4 teams are all projected to win out, Denver convincingly, and if this happens, New England will be left out of the first round byes.
Baltimore is expected to win the AFC North, and Indianapolis and now Cincinnati instead of Pittsburgh the wildcards.
The NFC has gotten interesting with the NFC East up for grabs and now a race for the 2 wildcard spots. Washington is given the edge being projected to finish 10-6 ahead of the Giants and Cowboys both at 9-7. But those two teams still have a shot at the wildcard given Chicago's fall as they are also projected at 9-7 with Minnesota being there too. It could come down to which teams are at that record and thus which tie-breakers come into play, but the Giants then Vikings have the better conference record of the group.
I am also tracking the projected playoff teams by week so take a look at that to see how things change from week to week.
| Team | Record | % chance | % +1 | % -1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Record | % chance | % +1 | % -1 |
| Atlanta | 14-2 | 51.1 | 0.0 | 40.9 |
| Houston | 14-2 | 48.9 | 0.0 | 42.3 |
| Denver | 13-3 | 92.8 | 0.0 | 7.1 |
| New England | 12-4 | 64.7 | 0.0 | 31.6 |
| San Francisco | 11-4-1 | 51.6 | 35.5 | 12.9 |
| Green Bay | 11-5 | 48.3 | 43.5 | 8.2 |
| Indianapolis | 10-6 | 55.8 | 22.7 | 21.5 |
| Baltimore | 10-6 | 50.2 | 21.1 | 28.7 |
| Washington | 10-6 | 48.8 | 0.0 | 42.1 |
| Seattle | 10-6 | 48.6 | 38.4 | 13.0 |
| Dallas | 9-7 | 54.2 | 18.7 | 27.1 |
| Cincinnati | 9-7 | 50.9 | 26.1 | 23.0 |
| NY Giants | 9-7 | 50.6 | 40.5 | 8.9 |
| Chicago | 9-7 | 49.7 | 29.9 | 20.4 |
| Minnesota | 9-7 | 48.8 | 12.5 | 38.7 |
| Pittsburgh | 8-8 | 47.1 | 42.5 | 10.3 |
| St Louis | 7-8-1 | 46.6 | 11.7 | 41.8 |
| Miami | 7-9 | 58.2 | 14.4 | 27.4 |
| Tampa Bay | 7-9 | 53.8 | 14.6 | 31.6 |
| New Orleans | 7-9 | 51.9 | 22.9 | 25.2 |
| NY Jets | 7-9 | 50.6 | 29.0 | 20.4 |
| Tennessee | 6-10 | 62.0 | 11.8 | 26.3 |
| San Diego | 6-10 | 55.9 | 29.2 | 14.9 |
| Carolina | 6-10 | 55.3 | 33.5 | 11.3 |
| Buffalo | 6-10 | 50.8 | 18.6 | 30.6 |
| Arizona | 6-10 | 48.9 | 11.6 | 39.5 |
| Cleveland | 5-11 | 73.0 | 25.9 | 0.0 |
| Detroit | 5-11 | 47.3 | 13.5 | 39.2 |
| Oakland | 4-12 | 61.1 | 34.2 | 0.0 |
| Philadelphia | 4-12 | 58.1 | 36.7 | 0.0 |
| Kansas City | 2-14 | 66.1 | 33.2 | 0.0 |
| Jacksonville | 2-14 | 56.8 | 37.9 | 0.0 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


