The USTA publishes their end of year NTRP ratings in late-November/early-December and I had an influx of requests for my Estimated Dynamic NTRP Reports as people were curious about what their rating might be or looking for an explanation for why their rating was what it was. And while many adult leagues have already started in many areas of the country, I'm still getting these requests and I'm still generating the reports.
So if you are still interested in knowing more details about your rating and what your rating did throughout the year, feel free to contact me. I can generally create a report for players in any section as long as you've played enough matches in the relevant leagues.
But another report I'm now generating is a mid-season report. I've had quite a few requests by people wanting to know how their rating has changed after several matches to get an idea of if it is going up or down, or to get an idea of how far they are away from potentially being bumped up or down. I can also do these reports for most any section, so contact me for details.
And for reference, here is an example of a report or click here to see one too.
Jane Doe
Current NTRP: 4.5
Estimated DNTRP: 4.47
Match Record: 12-2
Sets Won-Lost: 24-5
Games Won-Lost: 155-72
Best Match Result: 4.92 on 2012-08-25
Worst Match Result: 3.80 on 2012-06-26
Highest Estimated DNTRP: 4.55 on 2012-09-19
Lowest Estimated DNTRP: 4.28 on 2012-06-26
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Superbowl Preview - 49ers vs Ravens
Here is a preview of the Superbowl using my computer's ratings.
San Francisco is rated #1 by my computer so they are the pick to win the game on a neutral field. But let's look deeper.
First, here is the 49ers performance chart.

This shows that in the majority of their games, they have been quite consistent, right around the low 90s with a few games a bit higher and a few a bit lower. Their losses and tie appear as aberrations but the fact they happened means one could happen again. To be fair though, the 2 losses in the last 9 games were both on the road and they just had a great road result in their last game.
If there is a "good" and "bad" 49er team, in their wins they averaged 93.1 rating points while in their losses they averaged 73.7. And if you look at just their last 4 wins they average a slightly higher 93.7.
Here is Baltimore's chart.

They haven't had quite as clear a disparity between good and bad, with some fairly consistent results in their wins in the mid to upper 80s through much of the season, then some poor results in losses, but then have been very strong in the playoffs. And you might throw out the Bengals game as meaningless so they've really had 4 strong results in a row recently.
If we look at just Baltimore's last 4 wins, they average 95.7.
So, looking at the entirety of the season, my computer would pick the 49ers by 3. With Vegas having the line originally at 5 and closer to 3.5 or 4 now, that would make the pick the Ravens to cover.
And if you assume the teams are both going to show up with their best games, one could make the argument that the Ravens best is actually a bit better than the 49ers, around 2 points, so that would seem to reinforce the pick of the Ravens plus the points and even give hope to those that are picking the upset.
Here is hoping for an exciting and competitive game.
San Francisco is rated #1 by my computer so they are the pick to win the game on a neutral field. But let's look deeper.
First, here is the 49ers performance chart.
This shows that in the majority of their games, they have been quite consistent, right around the low 90s with a few games a bit higher and a few a bit lower. Their losses and tie appear as aberrations but the fact they happened means one could happen again. To be fair though, the 2 losses in the last 9 games were both on the road and they just had a great road result in their last game.
If there is a "good" and "bad" 49er team, in their wins they averaged 93.1 rating points while in their losses they averaged 73.7. And if you look at just their last 4 wins they average a slightly higher 93.7.
Here is Baltimore's chart.
They haven't had quite as clear a disparity between good and bad, with some fairly consistent results in their wins in the mid to upper 80s through much of the season, then some poor results in losses, but then have been very strong in the playoffs. And you might throw out the Bengals game as meaningless so they've really had 4 strong results in a row recently.
If we look at just Baltimore's last 4 wins, they average 95.7.
So, looking at the entirety of the season, my computer would pick the 49ers by 3. With Vegas having the line originally at 5 and closer to 3.5 or 4 now, that would make the pick the Ravens to cover.
And if you assume the teams are both going to show up with their best games, one could make the argument that the Ravens best is actually a bit better than the 49ers, around 2 points, so that would seem to reinforce the pick of the Ravens plus the points and even give hope to those that are picking the upset.
Here is hoping for an exciting and competitive game.
Week 20 NFL Ratings and Rankings - San Francisco moves to #1
The ratings after week 20 are now posted and listed below as well.
San Francisco moves to #2 while New England drops to #3 after the conference championship games. Baltimore moves up two spots to #6 but still trails.
This means the computer likes the 49ers in the Superbowl, more to come.
San Francisco moves to #2 while New England drops to #3 after the conference championship games. Baltimore moves up two spots to #6 but still trails.
This means the computer likes the 49ers in the Superbowl, more to come.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | San Francisco | 87.869 | 13-4-1 | 82.266 | +2, +0.110 |
| 2 | Seattle | 87.785 | 12-6 | 82.296 | +0, -0.178 |
| 3 | New England | 87.340 | 13-5 | 80.332 | -2, -1.549 |
| 4 | Denver | 87.327 | 13-4 | 79.384 | +0, +0.170 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 85.607 | 12-6 | 81.545 | +0, -0.079 |
| 6 | Baltimore | 84.894 | 13-6 | 80.901 | +3, +1.277 |
| 7 | Atlanta | 84.705 | 14-4 | 80.013 | -1, -0.341 |
| 8 | Chicago | 83.815 | 10-6 | 81.106 | -1, -0.107 |
| 9 | NY Giants | 83.794 | 9-7 | 81.142 | -1, +0.170 |
| 10 | Houston | 83.332 | 13-5 | 80.187 | +0, -0.211 |
| 11 | Minnesota | 83.150 | 10-7 | 81.699 | +0, -0.103 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.671 | 10-7 | 80.964 | +0, +0.133 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.484 | 10-7 | 79.498 | +0, +0.250 |
| 14 | Carolina | 81.421 | 7-9 | 80.815 | +1, +0.012 |
| 15 | St Louis | 81.415 | 7-8-1 | 82.622 | -1, -0.225 |
| 16 | Pittsburgh | 80.614 | 8-8 | 79.427 | +1, +0.287 |
| 17 | New Orleans | 80.492 | 7-9 | 81.048 | -1, +0.025 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay | 80.174 | 7-9 | 80.531 | +0, -0.009 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.171 | 8-8 | 81.478 | +0, +0.125 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.428 | 7-9 | 80.196 | +0, -0.336 |
| 21 | San Diego | 78.982 | 7-9 | 79.124 | +1, +0.127 |
| 22 | Indianapolis | 78.841 | 11-6 | 79.134 | -1, -0.126 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.355 | 5-11 | 82.739 | +0, -0.211 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.394 | 6-10 | 79.905 | +0, -0.289 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.353 | 4-12 | 81.727 | +0, -0.142 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.000 | 6-10 | 80.737 | +0, -0.272 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.525 | 5-11 | 80.182 | +0, +0.246 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.328 | 6-10 | 79.808 | +0, -0.199 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.901 | 4-12 | 81.268 | +0, +0.126 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.302 | 4-12 | 79.712 | +0, +0.132 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 70.952 | 2-14 | 80.117 | +0, -0.207 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.545 | 2-14 | 80.423 | +0, +0.106 |
Monday, January 14, 2013
NFL Conference Championship Performance Charts
As a quick way to visually see how the final 4 teams have performed, here are their performance charts.

New England is #1 for a reason, they've had a lot of good results. I've had a few folks say they think even so, they are underrated, and what is holding them back are a few bad results. The Arizona and early season Baltimore loss don't count that much now, but the 49ers loss and narrow win over Jacksonville are holding them back a bit now. If you don't include those considering them aberrations their last 5 games have all been in the 90-100 range, very strong.

Baltimore had a tough patch late in the year, but were banged up a bit and perhaps the Cincinnati game didn't mean much to them. Ignoring that game, 3 of their last 4 have been in the 90-97 range, also quite strong.

Atlanta won a lot, but played a weaker schedule. In fact, they've only had a few results over 90 late in the year, their best again the Giants. They certainly don't look as strong as the AFC teams unless they can repeat their peak form.

The 49ers have also been a bit up and down, but like the AFC teams their highs have been in the 90-100 range and they've had a bunch. They look a bit stronger in general than Atlanta and are ranked higher, but they have to go on the road.
New England is #1 for a reason, they've had a lot of good results. I've had a few folks say they think even so, they are underrated, and what is holding them back are a few bad results. The Arizona and early season Baltimore loss don't count that much now, but the 49ers loss and narrow win over Jacksonville are holding them back a bit now. If you don't include those considering them aberrations their last 5 games have all been in the 90-100 range, very strong.
Baltimore had a tough patch late in the year, but were banged up a bit and perhaps the Cincinnati game didn't mean much to them. Ignoring that game, 3 of their last 4 have been in the 90-97 range, also quite strong.
Atlanta won a lot, but played a weaker schedule. In fact, they've only had a few results over 90 late in the year, their best again the Giants. They certainly don't look as strong as the AFC teams unless they can repeat their peak form.
The 49ers have also been a bit up and down, but like the AFC teams their highs have been in the 90-100 range and they've had a bunch. They look a bit stronger in general than Atlanta and are ranked higher, but they have to go on the road.
NFL Week 19 Ratings and Rankings - New England stretches their lead
The ratings after week 19 are now posted and listed below as well.
New England stays #1 and Seattle stays #2, but the gap widens. The 49ers and Broncos swap spots right behind them.
Seattle loses a few ratings points but stays #2 because they were predicted to have a narrow (less than 1 point, computer almost called it perfect) win and lost by 2, so they were rated pretty close to correct. For the same reason, Atlanta's rating improves slightly but they stay #6 even though Green Bay at #5 did lose ratings points, just not enough.
Baltimore does move up 2 spots after their road win but will still be an underdog to the Patriots. Atlanta and San Francisco will be a very close prediction.
New England stays #1 and Seattle stays #2, but the gap widens. The 49ers and Broncos swap spots right behind them.
Seattle loses a few ratings points but stays #2 because they were predicted to have a narrow (less than 1 point, computer almost called it perfect) win and lost by 2, so they were rated pretty close to correct. For the same reason, Atlanta's rating improves slightly but they stay #6 even though Green Bay at #5 did lose ratings points, just not enough.
Baltimore does move up 2 spots after their road win but will still be an underdog to the Patriots. Atlanta and San Francisco will be a very close prediction.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | New England | 88.889 | 13-4 | 80.346 | +0, +0.333 |
| 2 | Seattle | 87.963 | 12-6 | 82.496 | +0, -0.172 |
| 3 | San Francisco | 87.759 | 12-4-1 | 82.181 | +1, +0.578 |
| 4 | Denver | 87.157 | 13-4 | 79.267 | -1, -0.929 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 85.686 | 12-6 | 81.643 | +0, -0.692 |
| 6 | Atlanta | 85.046 | 14-3 | 79.691 | +0, +0.163 |
| 7 | Chicago | 83.922 | 10-6 | 81.215 | +0, -0.131 |
| 8 | NY Giants | 83.624 | 9-7 | 80.983 | +1, +0.051 |
| 9 | Baltimore | 83.617 | 12-6 | 80.324 | +2, +0.698 |
| 10 | Houston | 83.543 | 13-5 | 80.398 | -2, -0.349 |
| 11 | Minnesota | 83.253 | 10-7 | 81.808 | -1, -0.191 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.538 | 10-7 | 80.842 | +0, +0.035 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.234 | 10-7 | 79.266 | +0, +0.018 |
| 14 | St Louis | 81.640 | 7-8-1 | 82.829 | +0, -0.002 |
| 15 | Carolina | 81.409 | 7-9 | 80.805 | +0, -0.087 |
| 16 | New Orleans | 80.467 | 7-9 | 81.020 | +0, -0.039 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 80.327 | 8-8 | 79.166 | +0, +0.056 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay | 80.183 | 7-9 | 80.521 | +0, -0.058 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.046 | 8-8 | 81.332 | +0, +0.031 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.764 | 7-9 | 80.513 | +0, +0.037 |
| 21 | Indianapolis | 78.967 | 11-6 | 79.280 | +0, -0.053 |
| 22 | San Diego | 78.855 | 7-9 | 78.993 | +0, -0.060 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.566 | 5-11 | 82.969 | +0, +0.017 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.683 | 6-10 | 80.231 | +0, +0.022 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.495 | 4-12 | 81.854 | +0, -0.119 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.272 | 6-10 | 81.061 | +0, +0.023 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.279 | 5-11 | 79.913 | +0, +0.020 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.527 | 6-10 | 80.030 | +0, -0.105 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.775 | 4-12 | 81.127 | +0, +0.044 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.170 | 4-12 | 79.587 | +0, -0.071 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 71.159 | 2-14 | 80.340 | +0, -0.076 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.439 | 2-14 | 80.286 | +0, -0.078 |
Monday, January 7, 2013
College Football Week 20 and Final Ratings and Rankings - Alabama #1
This week's and the season's final ratings and rankings are now posted.
Alabama moves to #1 after swapping it back and forth with Oregon during the bowl season with their dominating win over Notre Dame. They aren't that far ahead of Oregon, less than 0.7 ratings points, but they finish #1 never the less.
The SEC is well represented after that with Texas A&M, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina in spots 3 thru 6 and LSU at #9. The Pac-12 is represented with 2 teams with Stanford at #10 joining Oregon.
The top-25 is below, full ratings on the site.
Alabama moves to #1 after swapping it back and forth with Oregon during the bowl season with their dominating win over Notre Dame. They aren't that far ahead of Oregon, less than 0.7 ratings points, but they finish #1 never the less.
The SEC is well represented after that with Texas A&M, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina in spots 3 thru 6 and LSU at #9. The Pac-12 is represented with 2 teams with Stanford at #10 joining Oregon.
The top-25 is below, full ratings on the site.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | Alabama | 93.564 | 13-1 | 73.779 | +1, +2.262 |
| 2 | Oregon | 92.886 | 12-1 | 72.047 | -1, -0.111 |
| 3 | Texas A&M | 89.930 | 11-2 | 74.817 | +0, +0.574 |
| 4 | Georgia | 88.235 | 12-2 | 74.265 | +0, +0.684 |
| 5 | Florida | 86.630 | 11-2 | 76.239 | +1, +0.327 |
| 6 | South Carolina | 86.298 | 11-2 | 74.580 | +1, +0.399 |
| 7 | Kansas St | 85.669 | 11-2 | 74.441 | +1, -0.075 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | 85.252 | 12-1 | 74.985 | -3, -1.508 |
| 9 | LSU | 84.879 | 10-3 | 74.538 | +0, +0.700 |
| 10 | Stanford | 83.733 | 12-2 | 75.418 | +0, -0.237 |
| 11 | Ohio State | 83.413 | 12-0 | 69.739 | +0, +0.049 |
| 12 | Florida St | 82.778 | 12-2 | 66.569 | +0, -0.045 |
| 13 | Utah St | 82.708 | 11-2 | 65.806 | +0, -0.099 |
| 14 | Oklahoma | 82.607 | 10-3 | 74.066 | +0, -0.128 |
| 15 | Oregon St | 81.932 | 9-4 | 74.181 | +0, -0.112 |
| 16 | Clemson | 81.757 | 11-2 | 69.976 | +1, +0.110 |
| 17 | Oklahoma St | 81.710 | 8-5 | 71.373 | -1, -0.043 |
| 18 | Baylor | 80.463 | 8-5 | 75.068 | +0, -0.163 |
| 19 | Wisconsin | 80.048 | 8-6 | 73.061 | +0, +0.016 |
| 20 | Michigan | 79.695 | 8-5 | 73.560 | +0, +0.142 |
| 21 | Texas | 79.595 | 9-4 | 74.879 | +0, +0.049 |
| 22 | Vanderbilt | 79.305 | 9-4 | 70.711 | +2, +0.479 |
| 23 | Brigham Young | 79.256 | 8-5 | 69.171 | -1, -0.194 |
| 24 | Mississippi | 78.981 | 7-6 | 75.080 | +6, +1.775 |
| 25 | Southern Cal | 78.903 | 7-6 | 74.665 | -2, -0.270 |
Sunday, January 6, 2013
NFL Week 18 Ratings and Rankings - Patriots remain #1
The ratings after week 18 are now posted and listed below as well.
New England stays #1 but Seattle moves up to #2 just ahead of Denver. All three teams are very close and the 49ers are close behind before a bit of a drop to Green Bay and the rest.
New England stays #1 but Seattle moves up to #2 just ahead of Denver. All three teams are very close and the 49ers are close behind before a bit of a drop to Green Bay and the rest.
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | Rating | Record | Schedule | Change |
| 1 | New England | 88.556 | 12-4 | 80.348 | +0, +0.033 |
| 2 | Seattle | 88.135 | 12-5 | 82.143 | +1, +0.485 |
| 3 | Denver | 88.086 | 13-3 | 79.162 | -1, +0.005 |
| 4 | San Francisco | 87.181 | 11-4-1 | 82.213 | +0, +0.082 |
| 5 | Green Bay | 86.378 | 12-5 | 81.178 | +0, +0.482 |
| 6 | Atlanta | 84.883 | 13-3 | 79.452 | +0, -0.075 |
| 7 | Chicago | 84.053 | 10-6 | 81.354 | +0, -0.007 |
| 8 | Houston | 83.892 | 13-4 | 79.805 | +1, +0.098 |
| 9 | NY Giants | 83.573 | 9-7 | 80.928 | +1, -0.029 |
| 10 | Minnesota | 83.444 | 10-7 | 81.970 | -2, -0.502 |
| 11 | Baltimore | 82.919 | 11-6 | 79.797 | +1, +0.400 |
| 12 | Washington | 82.503 | 10-7 | 80.803 | -1, -0.518 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | 82.216 | 10-7 | 79.255 | +0, -0.166 |
| 14 | St Louis | 81.642 | 7-8-1 | 82.822 | +0, +0.028 |
| 15 | Carolina | 81.496 | 7-9 | 80.877 | +0, -0.053 |
| 16 | New Orleans | 80.506 | 7-9 | 81.086 | +0, -0.054 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 80.271 | 8-8 | 79.141 | +1, -0.040 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay | 80.241 | 7-9 | 80.590 | -1, -0.097 |
| 19 | Dallas | 80.015 | 8-8 | 81.287 | +0, -0.085 |
| 20 | Miami | 79.727 | 7-9 | 80.480 | +0, -0.004 |
| 21 | Indianapolis | 79.020 | 11-6 | 79.347 | +0, -0.505 |
| 22 | San Diego | 78.915 | 7-9 | 79.085 | +0, -0.023 |
| 23 | Arizona | 78.549 | 5-11 | 82.951 | +0, +0.058 |
| 24 | Buffalo | 77.661 | 6-10 | 80.195 | +0, +0.000 |
| 25 | Detroit | 77.614 | 4-12 | 81.978 | +0, -0.021 |
| 26 | NY Jets | 77.249 | 6-10 | 81.022 | +0, -0.020 |
| 27 | Cleveland | 76.259 | 5-11 | 79.880 | +0, -0.068 |
| 28 | Tennessee | 75.632 | 6-10 | 80.135 | +0, -0.068 |
| 29 | Philadelphia | 73.731 | 4-12 | 81.071 | +0, -0.095 |
| 30 | Oakland | 73.241 | 4-12 | 79.674 | +0, -0.026 |
| 31 | Jacksonville | 71.235 | 2-14 | 80.452 | +0, -0.092 |
| 32 | Kansas City | 70.517 | 2-14 | 80.372 | +0, -0.065 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)